Table 4 Association results. Estimates (β),p-values and statistical power in percentage (Power %) for the minimum effect size (β) from the Generalized linear model of the effects of predictive variables, and the interaction between, them on the outcome differences between baseline and after intervention measurements: BMI (Body Mass Index), TC (Total Cholesterol), LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein), HDL (High Density Lipoprotein), GL (Glucose) Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The explanatory variables were age, sex, ethnic group (Mestizos, Seris, Yaquis), and nutritional status (Normal weight, Overweight+Obesity)
Predictive Variables | β | P-value | Power (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Difference inBMI | |||
Intercept | −0.35 | 0.13 | |
Girls | − 0.15 | 0.09 | |
Age | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
Seris | −0.57 | 0.42 | |
Yaquis | 1.51 | 1 × 10−4 | |
Overweight-Obesity | −0.22 | 0.02 | |
Age*Seris | 0.04 | 0.59 | 73 |
Age*Yaquis | −0.10 | 0.02 | |
Difference in TC | |||
Intercept | 0.09 | 0.99 | |
Girls | −16.86 | 2.2 × 10−4 | |
Seris | 21.98 | 0.38 | |
Yaquis | −30.39 | 0.02 | |
Age | −2.10 | 0.03 | 100 |
Girls*Seris | 5.57 | 0.56 | |
Girls*Yaquis | 16.60 | 0.02 | |
Age*Seris | −1.92 | 0.46 | |
Age*Yaquis | 4.21 | 0.01 | |
Difference in LDL | |||
Intercept | 5.03 | 0.02 | |
Seris | 13.27 | 1.0 × 10−4 | |
Yaquis | 2.22 | 0.34 | 100 |
Overweight-Obesity | 5.27 | 0.02 | |
Girls | −4.09 | 0.05 | |
Difference in HDL | |||
Intercept | −6.14 | 6.6 × 10−8 | |
Girls | −4.03 | 0.01 | |
Boys*Seris | 5.94 | 0.01 | |
Girls*Seris | 8.21 | 2.6 × 10−4 | |
Boys*Yaquis | −2.60 | 0.11 | 100 |
Girls*Yaquis | 2.60 | 0.13 | |
Difference inTGL | |||
Intercept | −34.50 | 2.0 × 10−16 | |
Seris | 20.39 | 3.0 × 10−3 | |
Yaquis | 18.95 | 1.7 × 10−4 | |
Overweight-Obesity | −9.99 | 0.03 | 100 |
Difference in GL | |||
Intercept | −12.30 | 2.0 × 10− 16 | |
EtniaSeris | 26.90 | 2.0 × 10− 16 | |
EtniaYaquis | 5.80 | 3.8 × 10−05 | 100 |
Difference in HbA1C | |||
Intercept | 0.03 | 0.19 | |
EtniaSeris | 0.10 | 4.0 × 10−3 | 99 |
EtniaYaquis | 0.01 | 0.72 | |