Skip to main content

Table 4 Average increase a [95% CI] in developmental performance, linear growth and nutritional status from baseline to discharge, and from discharge to end-line and baseline to end-line, and effect size for significant intervention effect

From: Effect of play-based family-centered psychomotor/psychosocial stimulation on the development of severely acutely malnourished children under six in a low-income setting: a randomized controlled trial

Developmental outcomes

Outcomes

Increase from baseline to discharge b

Increase from discharge to end-line b

Increase from baseline to end-line c

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

Fine Motor

0.73 [0.28, 1.16] p < 0.001

0.31 [− 0.29, 0.94] p = 0.299

0.07

1.73 [1.1, 2.4] p < 0.001

0.85 [0.1, 1.6] p = 0.023

0.15

2.50 [1.9, 3.1] p = 0.001 0.38¥ [0.28, 0.47] p < 0.001

1.09 [0.5, 1.7] p = 0.001 0.13¥ [0.01, 0.24] p = 0.033

0.22 Ÿ

Gross Motor

0.36 [0.01, 0.7] p = 0.044 0.40 [0.07, 0.74] p = 0.019

0.98 [0.5, 1.5] p = 0.001 0.88 [0.40, 1.37] p < 0.001

0.26

3.9 [3.3, 4.5] p < 0.001

−0.6 [−1.5, 0.3] p = 0.222

− 0.20

4.3 [3.6, 4.9] p < 0.001 0.63¥ [0.54, 0.73] p < 0.001

0.4 [− 0.50, 1.3] p = 0.376–0.004¥ [− 0.14, 0.13] p = 0.948

0.06

Language

0.5 [0.1, 1.0] p = 0.022

0.01 [− 0.7, 0.7] p = 0.966

0.45

3.3 [2.5, 4.0] p < 0.001

0.5 [− 0.5, 1.5] p = 0.326

0.07

3.8 [3.0, 4.5] p < 0.001 0.55¥ [0.44, 66] p < 0.001

0.5 [− 0.5, 1.5] p = 0.329 0.07¥ [− 0.07, 0.21] p = 0.341

0.07

Personal Social

0.7 [0.3, 1.0] p = 0.001

−0.06 [− 0.6, 0.4] p = 0.812

−0.02

2.6 [2.0, 3.2] p < 0.001

0.12 [−0.7, 0.9] p = 0.762

− 0.03

3.2 [2.6, 3.8] p < 0.001 0.46¥ [0.37, 0.55] p < 0.001

0.06 [− 0.7, 0.8] p = 0.865 0.01¥ [− 0.11, 0.13] p = 0.887

0.011

Social-emotional Behavior

−12.8 [− 17.0, −8.5] p = 0.001

1.7 [−4.3, 7.7] p = 0.583

0.04

−1.8 [−7.6, 3.9] p = 0.256

− 4.3 [− 12.4, 3.8] p = 0.295

− 0.09

− 14.6 [− 20, −9.0] p < 0.001 1.78¥ [− 2.63, − 0.94] p < 0.001

−2.64 [− 9.2, 3.9] p = 0.426–0.36¥ [− 1.50, 0.78] p = 0.541

−0.09

Linear growth and nutritional outcomes

Outcomes

Increase from baseline to discharge b

 

Increase from discharge to end-line b

 

Increase from baseline to end-line c

 

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

Control group

Intervention effect

Effect size

HAZ

−0.05 [− 0.2, 0.1] p = 0.419

− 0.05 [− 0.1, 0.1] p = 0.633

−0.03

0.2 [0.01,0.4] p = 0.039

0.03 [−0.2, 0.3] p = 0.790

0.03

0.2 [−0.1,0.4] p = 0.138 0.03¥ [− 0.01, 0.07 p = 0.104

−0.004 [− 0.3, 0.3] p = 0.978–0.01¥ [− 0.05, 0.04] p = 0.753

−0.002

MUACZ

0.3 [0.1, 0.4] p = 0.002 0.34 [0.24, 0.44] p < 0.001

0.2 [− 0.04, 0.35] P = 0.123 0.15 [− 0.04, 0.35] p = 0.123

0.12

1.9 [1.6, 2.2] p < 0.001

− 0.2 [− 0.5,0.2] p = 0.430

0.00

2.1 [1.8, 2.4] p < 0.001 0.34¥ [0.29, 0.39] p < 0.001

0.002 [− 0.4, 0.4] p = 0.999–0.02¥ [− 0.09, 0.05] p = 0.596

- < 0.001

WAZ

0.2 [0.03, 0.30] p = 0.022

0.1 [− 0.1, 0.3] p = 0.260

0.08

1.1 [0.9, 1.3] p < 0.001

− 0.3 [− 0.7,0.1] p = 0.155

−0.20

1.3 [1.0, 1.5] p = 0.001 1.30.19¥ [0.15, 0.23] p < 0.001

− 0.2 [− 0.7, 0.2] p = 0.372–0.06¥ [− 0.13, 0.01] p = 0.112

−0.02

WHZ or BAZ

0.5 [0.2, 0.8] p < 0.001

0.04 [−0.2, 0.3] p = 0.791

0.02

1.5 [1.1, 1.8] p < 0.001

−0.2 [− 0.6, 0.2] p = 0.321

− 0.04

2.0 [1.7, 2.3] p < 0.001 0.29¥ [0.24, 0.34] p < 0.001

−0.2 [− 0.5, 0.2] p = 0.352–0.06¥ [− 0.123, 001] p = 0.054

−0.06

  1. In full model, parameter estimates are based on all significant and non-significant terms
  2. In reduced model, parameter estimates are based on a parsimonious model that includes statistically significant terms and only essential non-significant model terms
  3. BAZ body-mass-index-for-age z score, GEE Generalized Estimating Equations, HAZ height/length-for-age z score, MUACZ mid-upper-arm-circumference z score, WAZ weight-for-age z score, WHZ weight-for-height/length z score
  4. aThe increase for the control group during the follow-up time and the intervention effect (additional increase for the intervention group). When there is no intervention effect, the average increase of the control group and intervention group are equal
  5. bA GEE model using time as a factor variable. As a factor variable (parameters marked with “‡, †”, time indicates the follow-up phases (hospital-based, home-based or a combination of both)
  6. cA GEE model using time both as factor variable and as a continuous variable (parameters marked by “¥” . As a continuous variable, time indicates a mean change in the outcome variable when the duration of follow-up increases by 1 day)
  7. Obtained from a full model comprising time as factor variables (y = Time2 + Time3+ Time2*Treatment +Time3*Treatment, where Time1 = 0)
  8. Obtained from a reduced model comprising time as factor variables
  9. ¥ Obtained from a full model comprising time as a continuous variable (y = Time + Treatment+ Time*Treatment)