Measure | Country | Age range | Studies involved | Conclusions and main findings1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChAS-T | Israel | 4–8 yrs. | Rosenblum [58] | Strengths: -Good item consistency and concurrent validity -Distinguishes between children with and without DCD To be developed: -Larger samples and wider age range (validity and reliability studied only in age range of 5–6.5 years) -Gender difference not studied -No sensitivity or specificity scores -Neither intra-rater nor test–retest reliability results |
Checklist | UK | school-age children | Dussart [71] | Strength: -The first screening instrument developed for teachers in the normal school population To be developed: -Sample selection and size not described -No reliability information -Validity studied only superficially -Many false positives |
GMRS | Netherlands | 3–7 yrs. | Netelenbos [61] | Strength: -Good reliability To be developed: -No sensitivity and specificity scores |
M-ABC-C / M-ABC-2-C | UK | 5.4–15.6 yrs. | Capistrano et al. [72]; De Milander [73]; Green et al. [67]; Junaid et al. [63]; Piek & Edwards [43]; Schoemaker et al. [25]; Schoemaker et al. [44]; Wright et al. [45]; Wright & Sugden [74] | Strengths: -Some good test–retest reliability scores -Translated in many countries To be developed: -Too long and time-consuming -Very low sensitivity: none of the studies met the required criteria -Inter-rater reliability not studied |
MOQ-T | Netherlands | 5–11 yrs. | Asunta et al. [41]; Giofre et al. [42]; Schoemaker et al. [62] | Strengths: - Good construct validity - Sensitivity met the criteria - Good discriminant validity and concurrent validity - High internal consistency - Good sample sizes - Both population and clinical referred samples - Fast to fill, usability good To be developed: - Specificity is slightly too low - Inter-rater and test–retest reliability not studied |
TEAF | Canada | 6–11 yrs. | Faught et al. [91]; Engel-Yeger et al. [16]; Rosenblum & Engel-Yeger [47] | Strengths: - Sensitivity met the criteria - Predicts participation preference To be developed: - Specificity is slightly too low - No inter-rater or test–retest reliability scores |