Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of mean score of pre- and post-intervention

From: Impact of a standardized protocol for the Management of Prolonged Neonatal Jaundice in a regional setting: an interventional quasi-experimental study

Management of prolonged neonatal jaundice

Mean (SD)

p value*

Pre (n = 199 cases)

Post (n = 145 cases)

Postnatal age upon referral (day)

16.54 (± 5.46)

20.01 (±11.14)

p = 0.001

Days taken to be seen at hospital level after referral (days)

20.9 (±11.38)

21.5 (±9.69)

p = 0.617

Clinical Assessment

5 important points in patient history taking (score)a

3.26 (±1.58)

4.44 (±0.92)

p < 0.001

4 important points in family history taking (score)b

0.53 (±1.10)

2.14 (±1.89)

p < 0.001

5 important points in physical examinations (score)c

3.78 (±1.50)

4.49 (±1.00)

p < 0.001

Number of lab investigations done before referral to the hospital

2.22 (±2.09)

1.57 (±1.68)

p = 0.020

Total number of laboratory investigations done per patient at the hospital level

9.01 (±2.99)

5.81 (±3.12)

p < 0.001

Total number of visits per patient from the time of referral to discharge

2.46 (±1.27)

2.20 (±0.92)

p = 0.040

Warning sign givend

NA

75.2%

NA

  1. *Student T-test was used to compare mean score of managing PNNJ pre and post implementation of new protocol
  2. aPatient history referring to feeding method, self-reported stool colour, urine colour, weight gain, neonatal jaundice (before day 14 of life)
  3. bFamily history referring to family history of blood disorders, severe/obstructive jaundice, renal problem, congenital hypothyroidism
  4. cPhysical examination referring to general appearance of the baby, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal/ organomegaly and central nervous system
  5. dWarning sign referring to unwell baby/ pale stool dark yellow urine/ new onset of jaundice/ persistent jaundice > 2 months