Table 5 Clinical evaluation, PSYCa 6–36 cross-cultural validation study, Kenya, Cambodia, Uganda
Kenya 2 (n = 215) | Cambodia (n = 148) | Uganda (n = 142) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | |
CGIS score | ||||||
1: Normal, not at all ill | 204 | 94.9 | 135 | 91.2 | 127 | 89.5 |
2: Borderline mentally ill | 4 | 1.9 | 11 | 7.4 | 12 | 8.4 |
3: Mildly ill | 5 | 2.3 | 1 | 0.7 | 3 | 2.1 |
4: Moderately ill | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 |
5: Markedly ill | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6: Severely ill | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7: Extremely ill | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PIRGAS scores | ||||||
91–100: Well adapted | 184 | 85.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 3.6 |
81–90: Adapted | 29 | 13.5 | 122 | 82.4 | 41 | 29.3 |
71–80: Perturbed | 2 | 0.9 | 20 | 13.5 | 65 | 46.4 |
61–70: Significantly perturbed | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4.1 | 15 | 10.7 |
51–60: Distressed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7.2 |
41–50: Disturbed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2.1 |
31–40: Disordered | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.7 |