Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Eleven percent intact PGM3 in a severely immunodeficient patient with a novel splice-site mutation, a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Karin Lundin
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dae-Chul Jeong
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Denise M. Kay
28 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karin Lundin
Resubmission - Version 3
28 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Denise M. Kay
16 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Karin Lundin
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12887-018-1258-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement