This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Umbilical cord bilirubin as a predictor of neonatal jaundice: a retrospective cohort study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 4 February 2016
Accepted: 12 September 2017
Published: 20 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Feb 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tina Slusher|
|17 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deepak Chawla|
|19 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kelsey Jones|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deepak Chawla|
|1 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kelsey Jones|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12887-017-0938-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.