Skip to main content

Table 8 Mean score of DAR and PM globallyand in the present studies using the EI

From: The effect of various factors on the dental arch relationship in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate children assessed by new approach: a retrospective study

Author

Number of sample (n)

Mean score (SD)

Dental arch relationship

Palatal morphology

Fudalej et al. (2011) [7]

Warsaw group-61

2.58 (0.92)

1.79 (0.43)

Nijmegen-97

1.97 (0.88)

1.96 (0.55)

Fudalej et al. (2012) [11]

Exposed group-47

3.04 (1.00)

1.88 (0.57)

Unexposed group-61

2.63 (0.97)

1.81 (0.55)

Present study

Male-43

2.51 (0.95)

1.95 (0.65)

Female-41

2.37 (0.94)

1.90 (0.59)

Left UCLP-51

2.53 (0.86)

1.98 (0.55)

Right UCLP-33

2.30 (1.05)

1.85 (0.71)

CUCLP-31

2.74 (0.85)

2.23 (0.50)

IUCLP-53

2.26 (0.94)

1.75 (0.62)

FH cleft +ve-50

2.42 (0.95)

1.98 (0.65)

FH cleft -ve-34

2.47 (0.93)

1.85 (0.56)

FH class III + ve-34

2.47 (0.86)

2.08 (0.62)

FH class III -ve-50

2.42 (0.99)

1.82 (0.60)

Cheiloplasty-MT- 35

2.40 (0.95)

2.23 (0.65)

Cheiloplasty-MMT- 49

2.47 (0.94)

1.71 (0.50)

Palatoplasty BT- 44

2.32 (0.96)

1.63 (0.49)

Palatoplasty V-Y PT-40

2.58 (0.90)

2.25 (0.59)

Back to article page

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us