Skip to main content

Table 5 Distribution of subjects with variable factors in favorable and unfavorable groups (the numbers of subjects in favorable and unfavorable groups were 37 and 47, respectively)

From: The effect of various factors on the dental arch relationship in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate children assessed by new approach: a retrospective study

Variables

Favorable, n (%)

Unfavorable, n (%)

Gender

 Male

18(48.6)

25(53.2)

 Female

26(63.4)

15(36.6)

UCLP affected side

 Left

20(54.1)

31(66.0)

 Right

17(45.9)

16(34.0)

UCLP type

 Complete

10(27.0)

21(44.7)

 Incomplete

27(73.0)

27(55.3)

Family history of cleft

 Positive

23(62.2)

27(57.4)

 Negative

14(37.8)

20(42.6)

Family history of Class III

 Positive

16(43.2)

18(38.3)

 Negative

21(56.8)

29(61.7)

Palatoplasty

 Bardach technique

21(56.8)

23(48.9)

 V-Y pushback technique

16(43.2)

24(51.1)

Cheiloplasty

 Millard technique

18(48.6)

17(36.2)

 Modified Millard technique

19(51.4)

30(63.8)