Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of three different methods for risk adjustment in neonatal medicine

BMC PediatricsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:106

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0861-5

Received: 23 November 2016

Accepted: 6 April 2017

Published: 17 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kai König
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Okolo
13 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugenia Pallotto
15 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Adams
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Adams
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12887-017-0861-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich
(2)
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich

Advertisement