Skip to main content

Table 2 Study description and protocol used

From: Evaluating reporting and process quality of publications on UNHS: a systematic review of programmes

ID

Source – Country – Study design

Starting year + duration in months

Criteria used for assessment of Audiological Risk

Healthcare Setting

Tests

Number of tests (before discharge; after d.; total)

Extent of Hearing Loss for screening phase

Operator performing the test

Testing environmental conditions

1

Bevilacqua M, 2010 [33] – Brasil - Hospital-based series

not exactly known, starting from 2004 to 2007 + 36 m

JCIH 2007

1 Hospital

OAEa

1; 1; 2

40 dB HL; unilateral

Audiologist

Non-sound-treated room (average noise < 45 dB)

2

Calevo M, 2007 [34] – Italy – multicentric Hospital-based series

2002, February + 35 m

JCIH 1994

13 Hospitals

Bothb

1; 3; 4

50 dB SPLb,c; unilateral

N.R.

Sound-proof and faradized room

3

Cebulla M, 2012 [35] – Germany - Hospital-based series

2006, March + 60 m

N.R.

1 Well baby nursery - University maternity clinic

ABRa

1; 1; 2

35 dB nHLd (aABR); unilateral

Trained physician assistants, nurses

Quiet room (stage 1); acoustically and electrically shielded room(stage 2)

4

De Capua, 2007 [36] – Italy – Multicentric hospital-based series

1998, April + 100 m

JCIH, 2000

3 hospitals

Bothe

1; 2; 3

30 dB nHLd; unilateral

Technician

Silent room

5

Guastini L, 2010 [37] – Italy - Hospital-based series

2006, January + 36 m

Ad hoc

1 University Hospital

Bothb

1; 3; 4

40 dB HL; unilateral

ENT specialists experienced in neonatal screening techniques

Sound-proof and faradised room

6

Habib H, 2005 [38] – Saudi Arabia - Hospital-based series

1996, September + 89 m

JCIH 1994

1 Hospital

OAEa

2; 0; 2

26 dB HL; unilateral

Technician

N.R.

7

Kennedy C, 2005 [39] - UK - Prospective cohortf

1993, October + 36 m

Ad hoc

4 Hospitals

Botha

2; 0; 2

40 dB HL; bilateral

Trained nurse

N.R.

8

Korres S, 2008 [40] – Greece - Hospital-based series

N.R. + N.R.

N.R.

1 Hospital

OAE

3; 1; 4

40 dB HL; unilateral

Audiologist

Quite room

9

Lin H, 2007 [41] – Taiwan - Retrospective cohort

a) 1998, November + 60 m;

N.R.

1 Hospital

a) OAEa

b) Botha

c) ABRa

a) 2–3; 0; 2–3

b) 2; 0; 2

c) 2; 0; 2

N.R.; unilateral

N.R.

N.R.

b) 2004, February + 12 m;

c) 2005, March + 14 m

10

Rohlfs AK, 2010 [42] – Germany – multicentric hospital based series

2002 August + 48 m

Ad hoc

14 birth clinics and children hospitals

Both

2; 1; 3

35 dB (aABR); unilateral

Trained nurses and physicians

N.R.

11

Tatli MM, 2007 [43] – Turkey - Prospective cohort

2002 + 18 m

Ad Hoc

1 University Hospital

OAEa

1; 1; 2

N.R.; unilateral

N.R.

Quite room

12

Tsuchiya H, 2006 [44] – Japan - Prospective cohort

1999, July + 64 m

N.R.

1 Hospital

ABRa

1; 1; 2

35 dB HL (aABR); unilateral

Technician

N.R.

  1. aNo differences for neonates with audiological risk were specified
  2. bWith both automatic and diagnostic ABR
  3. cEquivalent to about 40db HL in voice frequency
  4. ddB nHL = Decibel Normal Hearing
  5. eDiagnostic instead of automatic ABR
  6. fData not reported in Kennedy have been gathered from Wessex [45]