Skip to main content

Table 1 Responses by Pediatricians Surveyed in Maryland to a Questionnaire Regarding Attitudes Regarding Influenza Immunization Practices

From: A survey of pediatricians' attitudes regarding influenza immunization in children

Demographics of respondents

 

   Median age of practitioners, y (range)

48 (25–91)

   Sex, %

 

Men

50.3

Women

49.7

Size and location of practice

 

   Location, %

 

Suburban

54.1

Urban

37.2

Rural

6.0

Combination

2.7

   Practice size, n

 

Median (range)

6000 (30–80,000)

Mean

8797

   VFC-eligible children in practices, %

 

Median (range)

20 (0–100)

Mean

32

Influenza immunization practices

 

   Patients in at-risk categories immunized with influenza vaccine, %

 

Children aged 6–23 mo

75

Children aged 24–59 mo

50

Children at high risk

80

Household contacts of at-risk individuals

45

   When and where immunization occurs, %

 

Regular visits

98.8

Sick visits

74.6

Special infkuenza immunization clinics

72.2

   Availability of callback system, %

39.8

   Vaccine types used, %

 

Thimerosal-free inactivated, median (range)

50 (0–100)

Thimerosal-containing inactivated, median (range)

50 (0–100)

Live attenuated nasal spray, median (range)

5 (0–100)

   How much more burdensome would it be to ask if the parent or a provider ever noted wheezing or asthma in the child (5-point scale; 1 = not at all and 5 = very), %

 

1

54.2

2

26.0

3

11.3

4

5.1

5

3.4

Profitability of influenza immunization

 

   How profitable is influenza immunization of children?, %

 

Cost neutral

46.5

Produces a loss

14.5

Minimally profitable

36.6

   What would improve profitability?, %

 

Better reimbursement

56.5

Better payment for vaccine administration

13.7

Less costly vaccine

8.7

All other responses

21.1

Participation in school-based immunization programs

 

   Would you support a school-based immunization program?, %

85.7

   Would you participate in a school immunization program?, %

60.8

   What would persuade you to participate?, %

 

Financial remuneration

57.5

Civic involvement

53.1

Source of new patients

22.9

Nothing

22.3

   How might you participate?, %

 

Off-site consultation

69.5

On-site supervision

52.5

Both on-site and off-site

38.4