A systematic review of the reporting of Data Monitoring Committees' roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric clinical trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Bassler|
|30 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Soll|
|1 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Sammons|
|28 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Ricardo Fernandes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Sammons|
|30 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dirk Bassler|
|2 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Ricardo Fernandes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Dec 2009||Editorially accepted|
|13 Dec 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-9-77|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.