Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of the systematic reviews by intended review type

From: Children in reviews: Methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses

 

Intended Review Type

Variable

Adult Reviews

N = 67

Child Reviews

N = 45

Mixed Reviews

N = 153

Not Specified Reviews

N = 143

Total

N = 408

Funding, N (%)

     

   External

26 (39)

23 (51)

67 (44)

89 (62)

205 (50)

   Internal

56 (84)

24 (53)

92 (60)

93 (65)

265 (65)

   No funding

6 (9)

10 (22)

45 (29)

22 (15)

83 (20)

Languages of studies, N (%)

     

   English only

1 (1)

0

0

3 (2)

4 (1)

   English and non-English (no language restrictions)

34 (51)

16 (36)

53 (35)

54 (38)

157 (38)

   Not specified

32 (48)

29 (64)

100 (65)

86 (22)

247 (61)

Included study designs, N (%)

     

   RCT

47 (70)

30 (67)

91 (60)

82 (57)

250 (61)

   CCT

20 (30)

15 (33)

62 (40)

60 (42)

157 (38)

   Other

0

0

0

1 (0.7)

1 (0.2)

Median number of included trials, Median (Interquartile range)

9 (3–14)

10 (5–13)

8 (3–12)

7 (4–17)

8 (4–15)

Median number of participants, Median (Interquartile range)

813 (263–1836)

718 (313–1712)

551 (235–1474)

776 (305–2151)

681 (210–1670)

Number of reviews where the authors planned a subgroup analysis by age, N

2

10

30

10

52

Number of reviews where authors conducted a subgroup analysis by age, N

2

6

20

3

31

Number of reviews where authors found a difference in effect between adults and children, N

1

0

0

0

1