Skip to main content

Table 4 Freqency of databases searched and other search methods used to identify primary studies included in systematic reviews of pediatric complementary and alternative medicine

From: Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine

Databases Searched

N

%

Medline (or Index Medicus)

32

68.1%

Cochrane Library

17

36.2%

Embase (or Excerpta Medica)

13

27.7%

PsycLit (or Psych. Abstracts)

13

27.7%

CINAHL

10

21.3%

Dissertation Abstracts

7

14.9%

Biosis (or Biological Abstracts)

6

12.8%

Science Citation Index (ISI)

5

10.6%

Current Contents

3

6.4%

Pysclnfo

3

6.4%

HealthStar

2

4.3%

SocioFile or Sociological Abstracts

2

4.3%

Other Bibliographic Databases1

12

25.5%

Other Trials Registries2

2

4.3%

Other search methods

  

Reference Lists Reviewed

34

72.3%

Experts / Corresponding Authors

16

34.0%

Hand Searching

11

23.4%

Conference Proceedings / Abstracts

8

17.0%

Pharmaceutical Companies / Manufacturers

6

12.8%

No search reported

4

8.5%

Personal Files

3

6.4%

Search mentioned but details not reported

3

6.4%

Subject Bibliography

1

2.1%

  1. 1Other databases searched included ALTA religions database, Cancelit, CISCOM, ERIC, Index to the Chiropractic Literature, MANTIS, Mental Health Abstracts, Phytodok and SIGLE 2Other trial registries searched included National Library of Medicine database of published trials and Oxford database of perinatal trials.