Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the analysis

From: Effect of low birth weight on childhood asthma: a meta-analysis

Study (reference)

Country of study, n.

Primary exposure measure (birth weight, g)

Effect size (95% CI)

Age at follow up (y)

Quality score

Adjusted

Davidson [16]

England, n = 248612

1000-2999 vs 3000-3999

OR 1.2 (1.1-1.3)

2-10

8.0

Yes

Chatkin [15]

Brazil, n = 981

< 2500 vs >2500

RR 1.32 (0.8-1.96)

4-5

5.5

Yes

Nepomnyaschy [19]

United States, n = 1803

< 2500 vs >2500

RR 1.57 (1.23-1.99)

< 3

6.0

No

Fergusson [17]

New Zealand, n = 798

< 2500 vs 2500-4000

RR 0.97 (0.6-1.58)

16

5.5

No

Lu [18]

Taiwan, n = 69979

< 3000 vs 3000-4000

RR 1.17 (1.09-1.27)

13-15

7.0

No

Yuan [26]

Denmark, n = 10190

< 2500 vs 2500-4499

RR 0.9 (0.43-1.89)

< 12

6.5

No

Wjst [24]

German, n = 2337

< 2500 vs >2500

RR 1.47 (0.64-3.36)

5-14

5.0

No

Remes [21]

Finland, n = 4141

≤ 2490 vs 2500-4190

RR 1.31 (0.85-2)

16

7.0

No

Yang [25]

United States, n = 3933

< 2500 vs >2500

RR 1.25 (0.73-2.15)

6-7

6.5

No

Rasanen [20]

Finland, n = 4502

< 2500 vs >2500

RR 0.97 (0.71-1.31)

16

6.0

No

To [23]

Canada, n = 671402

< 2500 vs 2500-4500

RR 1.18 (1.13-1.22)

6

8.5

Yes

Sin [22]

Canada, n = 83595

< 2500 vs 2500-4500

RR 1 (0.9-1.11)

10

7.5

Yes

Bjerg [14]

Sweden, n = 3430

< 2500 vs >2500

OR 2.6 (1.2-5.4)

7-8

6.0

Yes