Skip to main content

Table 4 Association of physician beliefs about neuroimaging with recommendation for 1% risk group

From: Variability of physicians’ thresholds for neuroimaging in children with recurrent headache

Belief

Response

Total #

# (%)

# (%)

Fisher’s exact test

Rec NI for 1%

Rec no NI for 1%

It would be possible to develop a clinical prediction rule that accurately determines risk for children with recurrent headaches.

Agree

97

54 (56%)

43 (44%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

17

7 (41%)

10 (59%)

p = 0.302

Neuroimaging is uncomfortable for many children.

Agree

66

32 (48%)

34 (52%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

48

29 (60%)

19 (40%)

p = 0.255

Patient comfort should be considered when making decisions about neuroimaging.

Agree

63

39 (62%)

24 (38%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

51

22 (43%)

29 (57%)

p = 0.059

Recommending neuroimaging is likely to cause anxiety for the patient or family.

Agree

70

36 (51%)

34 (49%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

44

25 (57%)

19 (43%)

p = 0.700

Recommending against neuroimaging is likely to cause anxiety for the patient or family.

Agree

73

42 (58%)

31 (42%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

41

19 (46%)

22 (54%)

p = 0.328

Patient and caregiver anxiety should be considered when making decisions about neuroimaging.

Agree

66

34 (52%)

32 (48%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

48

27 (56%)

21 (44%)

p = 0.705

The monetary cost to society should be considered when making decisions about neuroimaging.

Agree

82

43 (52%)

39 (48%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

32

18 (56%)

14 (44%)

p = 0.835

Caregivers of patients with recurrent headaches expect me to order neuroimaging.

Agree

62

37 (60%)

25 (40%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

52

24 (46%)

28 (54%)

p = 0.188

Patient or caregiver preferences should be considered when making decisions about neuroimaging.

Agree

59

35 (59%)

24 (41%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

55

26 (47%)

29 (53%)

p = 0.260

A delay in diagnosis leads to significant negative consequences for physicians.

Agree

95

52 (55%)

43 (45%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

19

9 (47%)

10 (53%)

p = 0.620

My colleagues believe it is important to avoid unnecessary neuroimaging.

Agree

96

48 (50%)

48 (50%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

18

5 (28%)

13 (72%)

p = 0.122

I am able to convince caregivers to agree with my point of view regarding whether their child should receive neuroimaging.

Agree

103

55 (53%)

48 (47%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

11

6 (55%)

5 (45%)

p = 1.000

I am able to determine which children require neuroimaging.

Agree

108

57 (53%)

51 (47%)

 

Neutral/Disagree

6

4 (67%)

2 (33%)

p = 0.684

  1. Two by two tables comparing agreement with the belief with the recommendation are presented along with p-values using Fisher’s exact test (no p-values were <0.05). Rec NI for 1% group = recommended routine neuroimaging for the 1% risk group; Rec no NI for 1% group = recommended against routine neuroimaging for the 1% risk group.