Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of included studies (N = 5)

From: Interventions to support children’s engagement in health-related decisions: a systematic review

Author (year)

Study design

Decision

Participants (n) and setting

Comparisons

Primary outcome(s)

Quality assessment

Rhee, 2008 [28]

RCT

Partaking in risk behaviors

41 children with asthma (20a + 21b); 4 rural outpatient clinics and 1 high school

Coaching and computer based program v. attention placebo

Feasibility of the decision-making program

d: Low Risk

g: Low Risk

j: Low Risk

e: Low Risk

h: Unclear

f: Low Risk

i: Unclear

Lyon, 2009 [27, 31]

RCT

End of life decision-making

40 children with HIV and their parents (21a + 19b); 2 hospital outpatient clinics

Coaching v. attention placebo

Communication quality, congruence of treatment preferences, decisional conflict satisfaction

d: Low Risk

gg: Unclear

j: Low Risk

e: Low Risk

h: Low Risk

f: Unclear

ii: Unclear

Adams, 2009 [26]

RCT

Sun exposure v. sun protection

819 children (395a + 424b); primary care physicians office

Coaching and computer program v. attention placebo

Sun protection behaviors, pros for protection, pros for exposure, decisional balance

d: Unclear

g: Unclear

j: Low Risk

e: Unclear

h: Unclear

f: Low Risk

i: Unclear

Hollen, 1999 [30]

CBA

Partaking in risk behaviors

64 cancer-surviving children (21a + 43c); campground

Workshop and weekly assignments v. no intervention

Decision-making, risk motivation, risk behaviors

d: High Risk

g: Unclear

j: Low Risk

e: High Risk

h: Unclear

f: High Risk

i: Low Risk

Adelman, 1990 [29]

Non-randomized CT

Psycho-educational decision-making

85 families (32a + 20b + 33c); university clinic

Pre-conference coaching v. no intervention v. attention placebo

Child participation

d: High Risk

g: High Risk

j: Low Risk

e: High Risk

h: Unclear

f: High Risk

i: High Risk

  1. aIntervention group.
  2. bPlacebo group.
  3. cNo intervention group.
  4. dRandom sequence generation.
  5. eAllocation concealment.
  6. fBlinding of participants AND personnel.
  7. gBlinding of outcome assessment.
  8. hIncomplete outcome data.
  9. iSelective reporting.
  10. jOther sources of bias.