Study | Type of Sample | N | Measure Instrument | Outcome (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adib et al. [7] | Prospectively (1) through hypermobility clinic and retrospectively (2) through rheumatology department included, based on referrals by specialists or hospital notes* | 125 | (1) Beighton score | Clumsy 44/92 (48%) |
Medical examination | Easy bruising 39/91(43%) | |||
(1 &2) Questionnaire | Poor coordination 30/86 (36%) | |||
Walked after 15 months 19/57(33%) | ||||
Clicky joints 25/84(30%) | ||||
Age range3-17 years | Learning difficulty 13/91 (14%) | |||
*number per group unknown | Dyslexia 2/88 (2%) | |||
Dyspraxia 6/87 (7%) | ||||
Engelbert et al. [12] | Retrospective hospital chart review of children with hypermobility complaints | Bulbena: passive maneuvers of 9 joints (thumb, little finger, elbow, shoulder, hip, knee, patella, ankle, and first metatarsophalangeal joint) and the presence of ecchymoses is recorded. Generalized hypermobility of the joints is present when a score > =5 is obtained in females and > =4 in males. | Delay in motor development: | |
(1) 9/16 (56%), no significant association between the delay in motor development (yes/no) and the Bulbena score. | ||||
n = 16 < 2.5 years of age (1) | 16 | |||
n = 56 ≥ 4 years of age (2) | 56 | |||
(2) severe; 14/56 (25%), at risk 12/56 (21%), age appropriate 30/56 (54%). No significant association between delay in motor development and the Bulbena score found. Median score P15 | ||||
1-2.5 years: Bayley Scales of Infant Development | ||||
4-12 years: Movement Assessment Battery for Children | ||||
Kirby and Davies [14] | Random group (mean age 10.8y, range 5-18y) of TDC (1) | 27 | (1)Parental responses and Movement ABC Checklist. | 37% of the children with DCD against 7.4% in the TDC group had symptoms of JHS. |
(2)MABC score <5% | ||||
Children diagnosed with DCD (mean age 12.5y, range 9-17y) (2) | 27 | (1)& (2) A questionnaire based on the ‘five-part questionnaire for identifying hypermobility’ | ||
Hands and Larkin [16] | Children with motor learning difficulties (MLD) | 52 | McCarron Assessment of neuromuscular development (MAND 1982) MABC (1992) | Overall, the group with MLD was significantly less flexible than the control group. The group with MLD had a higher BMI and lower performance levels on the sit and reach, sit-ups, standing broad jump, 50-metre run, and the shuttle run. |
Age and gender matched control group | 52 | |||
Qualitative observation of poor motor performance skills | ||||
Fitness assessment battery | ||||
Cantell et al. [15] | Children (8–9 years), adolescents (17–18 years) and adults (20–60 years) with high or low motor performance | 39 | MABC | The low motor competence groups scored higher on the BMI, had a greater percentage of body fat and showed poorer fitness results in endurance, flexibility and strength |
44 | DCDQ | |||
66 | Body Composition | |||
Cardio Respiratoir Fitness | ||||
Flexibility | ||||
Muscle strength | ||||
Lung capacity | ||||
Leisure participation |