This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
School-age effects of the newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction: preliminary findings
- Gloria McAnulty†1Email author,
- Frank H Duffy2,
- Sandra Kosta†1,
- Neil I Weisenfeld3,
- Simon K Warfield3,
- Samantha C Butler1,
- Moona Alidoost†1,
- Jane Holmes Bernstein†1,
- Richard Robertson†4,
- David Zurakowski†5 and
- Heidelise Als†1
© McAnulty et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 18 May 2012
Accepted: 27 November 2012
Published: 19 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - GLORIA MCANULTY|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Riviello|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lena Hellström-Westas|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - GLORIA MCANULTY|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-13-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.