Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: High prevalence of daily and multi-site pain – a cross-sectional population-based study among 3000 Danish adolescents

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Noel
25 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Greta Palmer
12 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Noel
27 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Greta Palmer
12 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Greta Palmer
12 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Michael Skovdal Rathleff
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Nov 2013 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-13-191

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement