This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The aluminium content of infant formulas remains too high
© Chuchu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 November 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 8 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Exley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Denise Bohrer|
|3 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clifford Lo|
|4 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Antunes|
|28 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Exley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-13-162|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.