Skip to main content

Table 5 Agreement with statements on screening assessment methods for central nervous system abnormalities in rounds 1 and 2

From: A modified Delphi study of screening for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia

Statement

R1 N

R1 % Agree(IQD)

R2 % Agree(IQD)

Central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities

   

Assessment of CNS abnormalities in FASD screening may include:

   

1. … developmental milestones

80

96 (1)

-

2. … motor and sensory function

77

88 (1)

-

3. … cognition (IQ)

79

92 (1)

-

4. … memory

78

89 (1)

-

5. … academic achievement

79

91 (1)

-

6. … executive functioning and abstract reasoning

79

89 (1)

-

7. … adaptive behaviour

75

92 (1)

-

8. … attention and hyperactivity

80

95 (1)

-

9. … communication (receptive and expressive language)

78

94 (1)

-

10. … social skills and social communication

80

93 (1)

-

11. … hard and soft neurologic signs (including sensory-motor signs)

74

87 (1)

-

12. … seizures that are not due to a postnatal insult or other postnatal process

74

78 (1)

-

13. … head circumference

78

96 (1)

-

14. … brain imaging

67

57 (1)

-

The choice of tests for neuro-behavioural assessments should be guided by:

   

15. … the availability of valid and reliable instruments

76

90 (1)

-

16. … clinician preference and experience

74

60 (2)

-

17. … test appropriateness for patient age and cultural background

78

97 (1)

-

18. At the screening stage it is not necessary to formally assess and measure suspected CNS anomalies

68

-

72 (1)

At the screening stage the following are acceptable indicators of possible CNS abnormalities (neurological, functional or structural):

   

19. … clinical identification

66

-

97 (0)

20. … parent or other credible third party report

66

-

91 (0)

21. … results of previous relevant formal assessments (e.g. psychological report)

65

-

100 (1)

Birth defects

   

22. FASD screening should assess and record the presence of birth defects as part of the clinical examination

81

99 (1)

-

  1. R1-Round 1; R2-Round 2; IQD-inter-quartile deviation.
  2. Includes responses ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’.
  3. Statement excluded from round 2 as proportion agreement was 59.5%.
  4. Results for statements that reached 70% agreement (consensus) are presented in bold.