Skip to main content

Table 3 Reporting of methodological characteristics of pediatric RCTs

From: 10-year trend in quantity and quality of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in mainland China: 2002–2011

Items

Quantity

 

(n, %)

Method of random sequence generation

 

Low risk

161 (14.9%)

  Random number table

121 (11.2%)

  Drawing of lots

28 (2.6%)

  Computer

9 (0.8%)

  Lottery

1 (0.1%)

  Coin toss

1 (0.1%)

  Dice

1 (0.1%)

High risk

 

  Visiting sequence of inpatient/outpatient, the card number of inpatient/outpatient number and birth date.

113 (10.5%)

Unclear

803 (74.6%)

Method of allocation concealment

 

Low risk

10 (1%)

  Central allocation

7 (0.7%)

  Sealed opaque envelopes

3 (0.3%)

High risk

--

Unclear

1067 (99%)

Blinding

 

Low risk

6 (0.6%)

 Single blind (participants)

3 (0.3%)

  Double blind (participants and investigators)

2 (0.2%)

  Triple blind (participants, investigators, outcome assessors)

1 (0.1%)

High risk

--

Unclear

1071 (99.4%)

Incomplete outcome data

 

Low risk

988 (91.7%)

High risk

--

Unclear

89 (8.3%)

Selective reporting

 

Low risk

--

High risk

18 (1.7%)

Unclear

1059 (98.3%)

Other bias

 

Low risk

--

High risk

2 (0.2%)

Unclear

1075 (99.8%)

  1. -- means no data available.