Skip to main content

Table 3 One-way sensitivity analyses of the cost-effectiveness of introducing MCADD screening and of switching to MS/MS technology for PKU screening

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal newborn screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in France

Parameter

Value or range for sensitivity analyses

ICER (€/QALY)

Base-case values

 

7 581

MCADD birth prevalence

1/10 000 to 1/25 000

3 444 to 15 856

MCADD screening test specificity

0.9997 to 1

7 878 to 6 987

Risk of developing a metabolic crisis

0.75

5 881

Risk of death within 72 hours of life

0.05

5 902

Risk of death after a metabolic crisis

0.01 to 0.03

13 180 to 5 314

Risk of mild neurological sequelae

0

9 175

Risk of severe neurological sequelae

0

12 823

Screening effectiveness (reduction in the risk of developing a metabolic crisis)

0.5

14 351

Utility of persons unaffected by MCADD

0.9

8 769

Utility of persons with severe neurological sequelae

0.45

7 121

Utility of persons with mild neurological sequelae

0.92

7 632

Cost of the MCADD screening test (€)

3.38 to 5.16

5 384 to 15 655

Annual cost of management of severe

15 000 to 150 000

8 832 to −19 139*

Annual cost of management of mild neurological sequelae (€)

4 500 to 120 000

7 911 to −17 353*

Cost of treatment of a metabolic crisis

4 730

7 211

% patients receiving L-carnitine supplementation until 18 years of age

0% to 100%

6 617 to 8 546

Number of medical consultations per year until 6 years of age

5

7 667

 

No discounting

−514*

Annual discounting rate

3% to 6%

4 954 to 13 598

  1. * A negative cost-effectiveness ratio indicates that the strategy is both more effective and less costly than the comparison strategy.