Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of secondary outcomes at follow-up by randomised group under intention-to-treat analyses

From: Effect on skin hydration of using baby wipes to clean the napkin area of newborn babies: assessor-blinded randomised controlled equivalence trial

Analysis (ITT)

Wipes (n = 124)

Water (n = 130)

Group effect P-value

95 % CI for difference in adjusted means

pH1, mean (SD)

(N = 118) 5.93 (0.58)

(N = 122) 5.65 (0.62)

0.356

−0.1 to 0.4

TEWL1, mean (SD)

(n = 119) 17.8 (7.0)

(N = 124) 19.0 (10.6)

0.486

−3.9 to 1.2

Log erythema1, mean (SD)

(n = 118) 6.27 (0.14)

(n = 129) 6.30 (0.14)

0.177

−0.06 to 0.001

Coliform bacteria2, median (IQR)

(n = 122) 2000 (53 to 45250)

(n = 128) 4850 (168 to 119500)

0.913

-

Candida species2, median (IQR)

0 (0 to 0)

0 (0 to 0)

0.454

-

Mother-reported dermatitis total 4-week score

    

Complete responses, Median (IQR)

(n = 93) 1.00 (0 to 7.5)

(n = 96) 2.5 (0 to 12.75)

0.025

-

Partial responses, Median (IQR)

(n = 108) 1.00 (0 to 7)

(n = 116) 2.33 (0 to 11.8)

0.016

-

Midwife-reported dermatitis at week 4, n (%)

  

0.300

-

No evidence of rash

108 (87.1)

109 (83.8)

  

Slight rash

13 (10.5)

14 (10.8)

  

Mild-moderate rash

2 (1.6)

5 (3.8)

  

Moderate-severe rash

1 (0.8)

2 (1.5)

  
  1. 1Buttocks.
  2. 2Peri-anal area.