Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship Between BMI≥85 th percentile or BMI≥25 in Adolescents and Nutrition Awareness and Label Reading Behaviors

From: Adolescent nutritional awareness and use of food labels: Results from the national nutrition health and examination survey

Variable

Odds Ratio (OR) 95%

Adjusted2 OR 95%CI

Nutrition Awareness 3(n=1160)

Confidence Interval (CI)1

 

Heard of Dietary Guidelines

1.04 (0.81-1.34)

1.06 (0.81-1.40)

Heard of Food Pyramid

0.72 (0.40-1.27)

0.72 (0.37-1.40)

Heard of 5-a-day Health Program

0.83 (0.66-1.04)

0.82 (0.66-1.02)

Nutrition Label Reading Behaviors4 (n=1160)

Use Nutrition Facts Panel

0.80 (0.45-1.40)

0.82 (0.66-1.02)

Use Ingredient List on Food Label

1.30 (0.83-2.04)

1.40 (0.90-2.19)

Use Serving Size on Food Label

1.03 (0.50-2.15)

1.06 (0.50-2.22)

Use Health Claims on Food Package

0.93 (0.58-1.47)

1.02 (0.66-1.57)

Specific Nutrition Facts Reading Behaviors (n=742)

Check Calories on Food Label

1.48 (0.95-2.31)

1.61 (1.03-2.51)

Check Calories from Fat on Food Label

1.23 (0.76-1.99)

1.36 (0.81-2.27)

Check Total Fat on Food Labels

1.00 (0.57-1.77)

1.09 (0.61-1.97)

Check Trans Fat on Food Labels

0.97 (0.58-1.62)

1.03 (0.59-1.79)

Check Saturated Fat on Food Labels

1.10 (0.62-1.95)

1.18 (0.66-2.14)

Check Cholesterol on Food Labels

1.89 (1.02-3.50) *

1.76 (0.95-3.24)

Check Sodium on Food Labels

1.57 (0.85-2.92)

1.59 (0.86-2.94)

Check Carbohydrates on Food Labels

1.26 (0.74-2.14)

1.32 (0.80-2.16)

Check Fiber on Food Labels

1.00 (0.57-1.76)

1.04 (0.61-1.78)

Check Sugars on Food Labels

1.26 (0.81-1.95)

1.29 (0.82-2.04)

  1. 1Unadjusted logistic regression models.
  2. 2Multivariate logistic regression models. Odds ratios are adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, foreign born versus US born and poverty status.
  3. 3Participant answered yes.
  4. 4Participant answered always or most of the time *P<0.05.