Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Outcome at two years of age in a Swiss national cohort of extremely preterm infants born between 2000 and 2008

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jordan Kase
8 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allison Payne
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neil Marlow
20 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olivier Claris
6 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Giancarlo Natalucci
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allison Payne
25 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olivier Claris
29 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jordan Kase
1 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neil Marlow
5 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Giancarlo Natalucci
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
21 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-12-198

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement