From: Facilitators and barriers to screening for child abuse in the emergency department
Propositions A. Policy | Agree | Disagree | No opinion |
---|---|---|---|
1. It is better to have an unjustified suspicion than to miss a case of child abuse (n=32) | 30 | 2 | 0 |
2. Other specialties are pleased to let the pediatrician conduct the discussion with parents in the case of suspected child abuse (n=32) | 25 | 1 | 6 |
3. Sometimes I do not report a suspicion of child abuse in order to avoid problems with the parents (n=26; not presented to members of the Board) | 10 | 15 | 1 |
Propositions B. Child abuse team, special child abuse attendant, cooperation with Child Abuse Center | Agree | Disagree | No opinion |
4. The Child Abuse Center is sufficiently accessible for reporting child abuse (n=26; not presented to members of the Board) | 15 | 3 | 8 |
5. When it comes to child abuse, patient privacy is subordinate to the interests of consultations between health professionals (n=32) | 23 | 6 | 3 |
Propositions C. Protocol for suspected child abuse | Agree | Disagree | No opinion |
6. In our ED more than 90% of the child abuse cases are detected (n=32) | 3 | 23 | 6 |
7. If no follow-up is organized, you might as well stop screening for child abuse (n=32) | 16 | 16 | 0 |
8. Our ED staff is well informed about when/when not to fill out a screening instrument for child abuse (n=32) | 16 | 9 | 7 |
Propositions D. Professional development | Agree | Disagree | No opinion |
9. My medical training was sufficient to enable me to detect child abuse in practice (n=26; not presented to members of the Board) | 3 | 20 | 3 |
10. Prejudice precludes proper detection of child abuse (n=32) | 24 | 8 | 0 |