Skip to main content

Table 1 Experiences of primary care

From: The social paediatrics initiative: a RICHER model of primary health care for at risk children and their families

Characteristics

Distribution or mean (N=86)

Strength of Affiliation:

 

Strength of Affiliation, grouped (%)

 

No/Weakest affiliation

11.6

Weak/Less Strong affiliation

24.4

Strong affiliation

64.0

Number of times used clinic in past 12 months, M (SD)

7.2 (10.5)

First Contact Accessibility

 

How quickly is your child able to see the nurse practitioner when the appointment you need is for common health problems? (%)

 

The same day

61.6

The next working day

5.8

Within 3 or more working days

27.9

How quickly has your child been able to see the Nurse Practitioner when the appointment you need is for an urgent, but minor health problem? (%)

 

The same day

66.3

The next working day

11.6

Within 3 or more working days

10.4

How long do you and your child usually have to wait at your Nurse Practitioner’s office or place of care from the time of your appointment until your visit begins? (%)

 

0–10 minutes

61.6

11–20 minutes

22.1

21–30 minutes

10.5

31+ minutes

4.7

Experience with Social Paediatrics Initiative (SPI) Clinic

 

In the past 12 months, has your child’s development been assessed? (%)

 

Yes

54.7

Among those assessed, concerns identified: (%)

 

Speech and Language

23.4

Learning

19.1

Social/emotional development

17.0

Behavioral problems

14.9

Other:

 

Physical ability

8.5

Vision

4.3

Hearing

6.4

Among those who had been assessed, was child referred to:

 

Development services

19.8

Supported child care or having special needs

20.9

SPI provider/team participated in, or helped you to organize a meeting to discuss about your child and put in place a plan of care with others? (%)

 

Yes

27.9

Relationship Continuity

 

See the same provider? (%)

 

Always

51.2

Usually

30.2

Sometimes

9.3

Rarely/Never

8.2

2NP knowledge of child (3 items)

 

M(SD)3

3.9 (1.0)

Observed range

1 – 5

Cultural Responsiveness

 

Difficulty getting health care because your cultural ways were not taken into consideration? (%)

 

Never

46.5

Rarely

8.1

Sometimes

8.1

Usually/Always

1.2

Language barriers when trying to get the ongoing care that you or your child needed? (%)

 

Never

36.0

Rarely

10.5

Sometimes

11.6

Usually/Always

5.8

Communication

 

1Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) General Clarity of Communication scale (2 items)

 

M (SD)

4.6 (0.6)

Observed range:

3 – 5

1IPC Explained Results scale (2 items)

 

M (SD) 4

4.3 (0.9)

Observed range

2 – 5

Decision Making

 

1IPC Decision Making scale (2 items)

 

M (SD) 5

3.7 (1.3)

Observed range:

1 – 5

How important is it to you to have a Nurse Practitioner include you in the decision-making of treatment plans for your child?

 

Not important at all

3.5

Somewhat important

16.3

Very important

77.9

Interpersonal Style

 

1IPC Compassionate, Respectful scale (3 items)

 

M (SD) 6

4.7 (0.5)

Observed range:

2.7 – 5

How important is it to you to have a Nurse Practitioner that treats you as an equal?

 

Not important at all

0.0

Somewhat important

10.5

Very important

88.4

Patient Empowerment

 

1Empowerment Scale (6-items)

 

M (SD) 7

4.2 (0.9)

Observed range:

2 – 5

  1. 1Potential range of scales are 1–5 where a higher score equals more of the concept; 5-always, 4-usually, 3-sometimes, 2-rarely, and 1-never. 2Potential range of scale was 1–5 where a higher score equals more of the concept; 5-excellent, 4-very good, 3-good, 2-fair, 1-poor. 3N=2 missing (2.3%), 4N=42 missing (48.8%) because items in the scale were not applicable, 5N=34 missing (39.5%) because items in the scale were not applicable, 6N=1 missing (1.2%), 7N=10 missing (11.6%).
  2. Note. Frequencies may not add to 100% due to missing data because items were not applicable.