This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The study design and methodology for the ARCHER study - adolescent rural cohort study of hormones, health, education, environments and relationships
- Katharine Steinbeck1Email author,
- Philip Hazell2,
- Robert G Cumming3,
- S Rachel Skinner4,
- Rebecca Ivers5,
- Robert Booy6,
- Greg Fulcher7,
- David J Handelsman8,
- Andrew J Martin9,
- Geoff Morgan10,
- Jean Starling11,
- Adrian Bauman3,
- Margot L Rawsthorne12,
- David L Bennett13,
- Chin Moi Chow14,
- Mary K Lam15,
- Patrick Kelly3,
- Ngiare J Brown16,
- Karen Paxton17 and
- Catherine Hawke18
© Steinbeck et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 July 2012
Accepted: 17 August 2012
Published: 5 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Paxton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-143|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.