Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Faecal calprotectin concentrations in apparently healthy children aged 0-12 years in urban Kampala, Uganda: a community-based survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elin Hestvik
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dietrich Rothenbacher
20 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathalie Kapel
23 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Malickova
15 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elin Hestvik
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nathalie Kapel
24 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dietrich Rothenbacher
27 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elin Hestvik
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elin Hestvik
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
2 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-11-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement