From: The role for osmotic agents in children with acute encephalopathies: a systematic review
Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Prabhakaran 2004[19] | The paper did not report on effect of the intervention, mannitol, on ICP or outcome |
Vialet 2003[23] | The study provides combined results for adults and children, and the data for children could not be extracted |
Kingston 1971[18] | There is little information on the characteristics of the participants. There is no data provided on the effect of the intervention, urea, on ICP or outcome |
Cruz 2002[17] | The use of the intervention, mannitol, was not clearly evaluated and the study does not demonstrate the relationship between mannitol use and outcome |
James 1977[22] | The study provides combined the results for adults and children, and the data on children could not be extracted. |
James 1980[21] | The study provides combined the results for adults and children, and the data on children could not be extracted. |
MacDonald 1982[25] | Reason for selective data presentation not given and administration of both treatments not clearly described |
Marshall 1978[24] | Age of subjects is not given and unclear statistical methods have been used |
Mickell 1977[20] | The relationship between the intervention and ICP or outcome is not described |
Procaccio 1991[36] | The study included a heterogeneous age group of patients that is not comparable and in whom standard treatment was not provided to all |