Screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in neonates: a comparison between cord and peripheral blood samples
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 September 2015
Accepted: 29 June 2017
Published: 11 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iqbal Elyazar|
|7 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adriana Montaño|
|20 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Saif AlSaif|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adriana Montaño|
|10 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saif AlSaif|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saif AlSaif|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12887-017-0912-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.