Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review

  • Heidi Anttila1Email author,
  • Ilona Autti-Rämö1, 2, 3,
  • Jutta Suoranta4,
  • Marjukka Mäkelä1, 5 and
  • Antti Malmivaara1
BMC Pediatrics20088:14

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-14

Received: 12 December 2007

Accepted: 24 April 2008

Published: 24 April 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Uvebrant
29 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adri Vermeer
1 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jan Willem Gorter
7 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Damiano
10 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Heidi Anttila
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Heidi Anttila
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Heidi Anttila
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-8-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (FinOHTA), at the National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES)
(2)
The Social Insurance Institute
(3)
Hospital of Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, HUS
(4)
Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere
(5)
Department of General Practice, University of Copenhagen

Advertisement