Incidence rates and management of urinary tract infections among children in Dutch general practice: results from a nation-wide registration study
© Kwok et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 15 August 2005
Accepted: 04 April 2006
Published: 04 April 2006
We aimed to investigate incidence rates of urinary tract infections in Dutch general practice and their association with gender, season and urbanisation level, and to analyse prescription and referral in case of urinary tract infections.
During one calendar year, 195 general practitioners in 104 practices in the Netherlands registered all their patient contacts. This study was performed by the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) in 2001. Of 82,053 children aged 0 to 18 years, the following variables were collected: number of episodes per patient, number of contacts per episode, month of the year in which the diagnosis of urinary tract infection was made, age, gender, urbanisation level, drug prescription and referral.
The overall incidence rate was 19 episodes per 1000 person years. The incidence rate in girls was 8 times as high as in boys. The incidence rate in smaller cities and rural areas was 2 times as high as in the three largest cities. Throughout the year, incidence rates varied with a decrease in summertime for children at the age of 0 to 12 years. Of the prescriptions, 66% were in accordance with current guidelines, but only 18% of the children who had an indication were actually referred.
This study shows that incidence rates of urinary tract infections are not only related to gender and season, but also to urbanisation. General practitioners in the Netherlands frequently do not follow the clinical guidelines for urinary tract infections, especially with respect to referral.
Urinary tract infections in childhood are common and may be difficult to diagnose in young children because of non-specific symptoms. Symptoms such as fever, vomiting, screaming, anorexia and irritability may indicate a urinary tract infection, but they are also common in other childhood diseases [1, 2].
The incidence of urinary tract infections during childhood is not only influenced by age, but also by gender. Before the age of 3 months, urinary tract infections are more common in boys; thereafter the incidence is considerably higher in girls [3, 4]. In younger children, urinary tract infections are mainly caused by autoinfection with commensals from the intestinal tract , whereas urinary tract infections in adolescent girls are often related to sexual activity .
Incidence rates of urinary tract infections in children reported in previous studies
incidence in boys per 1000
incidence in girls per 1000
child referred to hospital for UTI
hospital admission for UTI
culture requests positive
UTI diagnosed in hospital
UTI diagnosed in general practice
UK period unknown
UTI diagnosed in general practice
Van de Lisdonk 20002
diagnosed in general practice
Urinary tract infections in children are an important cause of renal damage and chronic renal failure. Early diagnosis, treatment, investigation and follow-up of children with urinary tract infections are likely to reduce such long-term complications [14, 15]. A guideline developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners is available . According to this guideline, nitrite testing should be performed, which, in case of a negative outcome, should be followed by a culture. Medication of first choice for children under the age of 12 years is a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid or co-trimoxazole. For children older than 12 years, trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin are alternatives. The following patients should be referred for further investigation: all infants under the age of 1 year, all boys under the age of 12 years, girls aged 1 to 5 years with only one recurrence and girls aged 5 to 12 years with more than one recurrence.
The frequency of urinary tract infections in relation to age and gender, as well as diagnostic procedures and treatment were investigated in several studies [1, 2, 4, 9, 17–19]. However, little is known about seasonal variation and urbanisation. Seasonal variations in the incidence of human disease are commonplace, but in the case of urinary tract infections this aspect has rarely been addressed [7, 9, 20]. Therefore, our first aim is to describe incidence rates of urinary tract infections among children in Dutch general practice in 2001 by age, gender and in relation to season and urbanisation level. It is important to know if there is a relation between these factors and urinary tract infections, because this could provide general practitioners information about patients in which they should be more alert for urinary tract infections. In addition, we are interested if general practitioners follow the clinical guideline for urinary tract infections with respect to prescription and referral.
We used data from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, which was performed by the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) between April 2000 and January 2002 [21, 22]. During the study period, 195 general practitioners in 104 practices throughout the Netherlands prospectively registered data about all their patient contacts during one calendar year. The participating general practitioners and practices were representative for all Dutch general practitioners and practices with regard to age, gender and location, including deprived areas.
In the Dutch health care system, general practitioners act as gatekeepers for secondary care. Every Dutch citizen is registered in general practice.
For socio-demographic characteristics (among which urbanisation) a short questionnaire was used and sent by mail to all patients registered in the participating practices (n = 385,461). Response on the questionnaire was 76%.
Characteristics, such as date of contact, type of contact, diagnosis (coded by the GP using the International Classification of Primary Care, ICPC) , drug prescription and referrals by the general practitioner, were registered for each contact by the general practitioner. The contact database was episode orientated, meaning that different consultations concerning the same health problem were clustered into one episode . Only new episodes, starting during the registration period, were included in our analysis. We excluded eight practices, because of incomplete registration.
Data were used from all children who were aged 0 to 18 years any time during the registration period. Of these, we selected all children with the diagnosis urinary tract infection (ICPC-code U71). This code excludes pyelonephritis, but does include recurring infections .
For all selected cases, the following variables were examined: number of episodes per patient, number of contacts per episode, month of the year in which the diagnosis was made, age, gender and urbanisation. Urbanisation was divided into the following four categories: < 30,000 inhabitants, 30,000–50,000 inhabitants, > 50,000 inhabitants and the 3 largest cities (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague).
The study was carried out according to Dutch legislation on privacy. The privacy regulation of the study was approved by the Dutch Data Protection Authority. According to Dutch legislation, obtaining informed consent is not obligatory for observational studies.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11 and Stata 8 SE. We first computed the incidence rate of urinary tract infections in general practice. To determine the incidence rate, the denominator was calculated by summating the total time period children were followed during the study period (patientyears). The 95% confidence intervals of incidence rates were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution.
We analysed drug prescription and referral by general practitioners anywhere during the episode, comparing these to the recommendations in the guideline on urinary tract infections developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners . We used cut-off points for age with respect to prescription and referral, similar to the guideline for urinary tract infection of the Dutch College of General Practitioners.
The total patient population consisted of 385,461 persons, of which 82,053 were at the age of 0 to 18 years.
Of all episodes of children at the age of 0 to 18 years, 1.15% (1695 episodes) was diagnosed as a urinary tract infection (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.21).
Of all children with a urinary tract infection (n = 1460), the mean number of episodes per year was 1.2 per child, with a maximum of 5 episodes during the registration period of one year. For each episode of urinary tract infection, the mean number of consultations was 1.7, with a maximum of 13 consultations. The proportion of episodes with only one consultation was 66%.
Number and proportion of prescriptions in accordance with the Dutch guideline for urinary tract infections, by age and sex group
age group (in years)
total number of prescriptions
prescriptions for medication of first choice number (%)
0 to 2
2 to 7
7 to 12
12 to 18
Number of children to be referred accordancing to the guideline for urinary tract infections, and actual referrals, by age and sex group (n = 225)
number of children to be referred according to guideline
actual referrals number (%)
girls and boys, 0-year of age
boys, aged 1 to 12 years
girls, 1 recurrence, aged 1 to 5 years
girls, > 1 recurrence, aged 5 to 12 years
The remaining 80 children had no indication for referral according to the guideline.
In this study, we found an overall incidence rate of 19 episodes of urinary tract infections presented by children in general practice per 1000 person years. This is strikingly similar to the incidence rate of 18.6 episodes per 1000 person years in 1987, found in the first National Survey, the design of which was very similar . It appears that the incidence rate hardly changed over the past 15 years. Our results may be considered representative for all children treated in primary care in the Netherlands.
We found a significantly higher incidence rate for girls (34.4 episodes per 1000 person years) than for boys (4.4 episodes per 1000 person years). Earlier studies also showed that urinary tract infections are more common in girls, but the male/female ratio of incidence rates varied. Comparing our results to those of earlier studies in other countries (Table 1), shows that our findings for boys are comparable to the other studies in general practice (range 1.7–3.8), but for girls our results are much higher (range of other studies in general practice (3.1–24.3). Especially the UK studies performed in the seventies [12, 13] show very low figures. A possible explanation of the higher incidence we found in girls than the Dutch study by Van de Lisdonk  is the greater age range in our study.
Our results showed a variation of the incidence rate throughout the year, with a decrease in summertime. This decrease was mainly found in children below the age of 12 years. Elo et al. and Stansfeld also found a decrease of incidence rates during the summer [3, 7]. A possible explanation, suggested by Stansfeld, is that upper respiratory tract infections may precede urinary tract infections. Since cough and colds are more common in the winter months, the same would apply to urinary tract infections .
On the other hand, Jakobsson found a higher diagnostic rate during the summer months , and a Korean study found pyelonephritis incidence peaking in summer. Mårild found no seasonal variation at all . Differences in age groups and composition of study populations may contribute to these conflicting results. For example, the study of Jakobsson only collected information from children under the age of two years , whereas the children in the study of Mårild were younger than six years . The age groups of children in the studies of Elo et al. and Stansfeld  were more similar to our age group and the Korean study included patients of all ages . Moreover, none of these studies were carried out in general practice, but obtained their information from pediatric centers or from health insurance claims data.
The incidence rate in smaller cities and rural areas is significantly higher than in the three largest cities. Although less clear, a similar trend was found in the first National Survey. An explanation could be that children with urinary tract infections in the three largest cities are more inclined to visit the hospital (emergency department) instead of the general practitioner. General practitioners in the three largest cities will miss these episodes during their registration period, resulting in a lower incidence rate. It is not likely that the discrepancy could be fully attributed to this explanation, therefore the clinical and epidemiological significance of urbanisation remains to be determined. A study carried out in Northern Norway (all ages) did not show a difference .
When general practitioners chose to prescribe medication for urinary tract infections, 66% of the prescriptions were in accordance with the guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners. This percentage varied with age. It is possible that general practitioners are less familiar with prescription of medication for urinary tract infections in younger children.
Our analyses showed, that only 18% of the referrals corresponded with this guideline. This could be an underestimation, because some of the patients may have had episodes of urinary tract infections before the registration period started. It appears that general practitioners are reluctant to refer children with urinary tract infections. It is also possible that they do not know the guideline or that they do not agree with it. Further investigations into this referral behaviour are necessary. Dependent on the findings, consequences for education of general practitioners may be considered.
In conclusion, this study shows that incidence rates of urinary tract infections are not only related with gender and season, but also with urbanisation. Furthermore, general practitioners in the Netherlands do not always follow the guideline for urinary tract infections developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners concerning prescription and referral. Especially the referral behavior of general practitioners differs considerably from the guideline.
The authors thank all participating GPs and their staff members for providing data. The Dutch ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports mainly funded the surveys, directly or indirectly. In addition, the "Stichting Centraal Fonds RVVZ" contributed financially to the second survey.
- van der Voort J, Edwards A, Roberts R, Verrier Jones K: The struggle to diagnose UTI in children under two in primary care. Fam Pract. 1997, 14: 44-8. 10.1093/fampra/14.1.44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van de Lisdonk EH, Verstraeten J: Kinderen met urineweginfecties: verwijzen of niet?. Huisarts Wet. 2000, 42: 343-6.Google Scholar
- Elo J, Sarna S, Tallgren LG: Seasonal variations in the occurrence of urinary tract infections among children in an urban area in Finland. Ann Clin Res. 1979, 11: 101-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larcombe J: Urinary tract infection in children. BMJ. 1999, 319: 1173-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bergström T: Sex differences in childhood urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Childh. 1972, 47: 227-32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen H, Weir M: Urinary tract infection as a possible marker for teenage sex. South Med J. 2002, 95: 867-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stansfeld JM: Clinical observations relating to incidence and aetiology of urinary-tract infections in children. BMJ. 1966, 5488: 631-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Winberg J, Andersen HJ, Bergström T, Jacobsson B, Larson H, Lincoln K: Epidemiology of symptomatic urinary tract infection in childhood. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1974, 252: 1-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mårild S, Jodal U: Incidence rate of first-time symptomatic urinary tract infection in children under 6 years of age. Acta Paediatr. 1998, 87: 549-52. 10.1080/08035259850158272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uhari M, Nuutinen M: Epidemiology of symptomatic infections of the urinary tract in children. BMJ. 1988, 297: 450-452.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pead L, Maskell R: Study of urinary tract infection in children in one health district. BMJ. 1994, 309: 631-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brooks D, Houston IB: Symptomatic urinary tract infection in childhood: presentation during a four-year study in general practice and significance and outcome at seven years. J Roy Coll Gen Pract. 1977, 27: 678-683.Google Scholar
- Dickinson JA: Incidence and outcome of symptomatic urinary tract infection in children. BMJ. 1979, 1: 1330-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Winberg J, Bergström T, Jacobsson B: Morbidity, age and sex distribution, recurrences and renal scarring in symptomatic urinary tract infection in childhood. Kidney Int Suppl. 1975, 4: S101-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wennerström M, Hansson S, Jodal U, Stokland E: Primary and acquired renal scarring in boys and girls with urinary tract infection. J Pediatr. 2000, 136: 30-4. 10.1016/S0022-3476(00)90045-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Timmermans AE, Baselier PJAM, Winkens PAG, Arets H, Wiersma Tj: Urineweginfecties. NHG-standaard (eerste herziening). Huisarts Wet. 1999, 42: 613-622.Google Scholar
- Hansson S, Bollgren I, Esbjörner E, Jakobsson B, Mårild S: Urinary tract infections in children below two years of age: a quality assurance project in Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 1999, 88: 270-4. 10.1080/08035259950170015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson G, Goutam P, Bainbridge M, Brown R: How well do general practitioners manage urinary problems in children?. Br J Gen Pract. 1990, 40: 146-149.Google Scholar
- Shortliffe LM, McCue JD: Urinary tract infection at the age extremes: pediatrics and geriatrics. Am J Med. 2002, 113 (Suppl 1A): 55S-66S. 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01060-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jakobsson B, Esbjörner E, Hansson S: Minimum incidence and diagnostic rate of first urinary tract infection. Pediatrics. 1999, 104: 222-6. 10.1542/peds.104.2.222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van der Zee J: Monitoring health inequalities through General Practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health. 2005, 15: 59-65. 10.1093/eurpub/cki116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Otters HBM, van der Wouden JC, Schellevis FG, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, Koes BW: Changing morbidity patterns in Dutch general practice: 1987–2001. Eur J Gen Pract. 2005, 11: 17-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamberts H, Woods M, Hofmans-Okkes I: The international classification of primary care in the European Community. 1993, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Ki M, Park T, Choi B, Foxman B: The epidemiology of acute pyelonephritis in South Korea, 1997–1999. Am J Epid. 2004, 160: 985-93. 10.1093/aje/kwh308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vorland LH, Carlson K, Aalen O: Antibiotic resistance and small R plasmids among Escherichia coli isolates from outpatient urinary tract infections in northern Norway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985, 27: 107-13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/6/10/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.