Technology-dependency among patients discharged from a children's hospital: a retrospective cohort study
© Feudtner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 27 October 2004
Accepted: 09 May 2005
Published: 09 May 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Oct 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michelle Mayer|
|5 Jan 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Kirk|
|9 Mar 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Feudtner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Mar 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michelle Mayer|
|23 Mar 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Kirk|
|31 Mar 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Feudtner|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Mar 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Kirk|
|6 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Chris Feudtner|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 May 2005||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2005||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-5-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.