Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Mortality in severely injured children: experiences of a German level 1 trauma center (2002 – 2011)

  • Carsten Schoeneberg1Email author,
  • Marc Schilling1,
  • Judith Keitel1,
  • Manuel Burggraf1,
  • Bjoern Hussmann1 and
  • Sven Lendemans1
BMC Pediatrics201414:194

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-194

Received: 14 March 2014

Accepted: 22 July 2014

Published: 30 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Trauma in pediatric patients is a major cause of death. This study investigated differences between decedents and survivors. Furthermore, an analysis of preventable and potential preventable trauma deaths was conducted and errors in the acute trauma care were investigated.

Methods

All patients aged less than 16 years with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 upon primary admission to the hospital between July 2002 and December 2011 were included in this study. Decedents were compared with survivors and an analysis of deceased children for preventable and potential preventable deaths was conducted. The acute trauma care was investigated regarding errors in treatment.

Results

Significant differences were found in Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, New ISS, Revised Injury Severity Classification, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score. Decedents had a worse head trauma with associated coagulopathy. The overall mortality rate was 13.4%. The majority of death occurred soon after arrival. No long term intensive care unit stay was found.

No preventable but one potential preventable death was analyzed. Most errors occurred in fluid volume management and in a delay of starting the therapy for hemorrhage and coagulopathy.

Prolonged preclinical rescue time and surgery time within the first 24 hours was found.

Conclusions

Head trauma is the determinant factor for mortality in severely injured pediatric patients. Death occurred shortly after arrival and long term intensive care stays might be an exception. In treatment of severely injured children volume management, hemorrhage and coagulopathy management, rescue time, and total surgery time should receive more attention.

Keywords

Trauma Severely injured Errors Pediatric Mortality

Background

Trauma remains a major cause of death for children worldwide [1]. In recently published studies, pediatric patients had a better outcome with a reduced mortality when treated in specialized pediatric trauma centers compared to adult trauma centers [2, 3].

The available literature on the treatment of severely injured patients refers mainly to adults. Most of the available algorithms have been transferred from adults to children, but only a few studies focus on severely injured children. Hussmann et al. reported a tendency toward a clinical decline with higher mortality after excessive prehospital fluid replacement [4].

Analyses of errors in the treatment of severely injured patients have been frequently performed in adults [58]. The results have led to the development of regionalized trauma care. Furthermore, these studies helped to reduce errors and improve the quality of trauma care.

According to Do et al., children represent only about 10% of all trauma admissions [9]. Together with the unique characteristics of pediatric injuries, treatment of severely injured children can be challenging.

Very few analyses of preventable or potentially preventable deaths in pediatric trauma care are available in the literature. Dykes et al. reported a 13% rate of preventable deaths. They define preventable deaths as all injuries with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) less than 6, AIS head score of less than 5 and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of less than 59 [10]. Diamond et al. reported a rate of preventable deaths of 7% for the region of Ontario, Canada [11]. This was a follow-up study of the same region and with the same criteria as the study by Dykes et al.

Esposito et al. reported an overall rate of preventable deaths in children of 9%, their rate for in-hospital deaths was 16% [12].

Only analyses done in North America were available. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of preventable deaths in Europe.

The aim of our study was to analyze the mortality rates of severely injured children admitted to a level 1 trauma center in Germany between 2002 and 2011. Additionally, all decedents were analyzed regarding errors in their treatment.

Methods

To examine mortality in severely injured children, data, collected for the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU), were analyzed. The data for this registry is collected prospectively.

Additionally, the patients’ hospital records, including the prehospital emergency physician notes, trauma room documentation, operative reports, imaging, electronic labs, and in-patient charts were retrospectively analyzed.

Analysis of the data from the Trauma Registry of the DGU received the full approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany. In addition, full approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Duisburg-Essen was received.

This analysis was a single-center study of a level 1 trauma center in Germany. Serving the catchment area of the Ruhr district with approximately 5.1 million habitants, it is one of the largest trauma centers in Germany. There are four level 1 trauma centers in the Ruhr district. According to the Whitebook of the DGU, a definition of recommendations on structure, organization, installations, and equipment of trauma centers in Germany, our trauma center fulfills all criteria for a level 1 and pediatric trauma center [13].

Inclusion criteria were primary admission to the hospital, an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16, admission between 1st July 2002 and 31st December 2011, and age of up to and including 15 years. No exclusion was made for deaths on arrival or in the trauma room.

The types of information collected of the included patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Collected information of included patients

Scales

General information

Laboratory test

Time periods

Interventions

Injury Severity Score (ISS)

Age

First hemoglobin value

Time from admission to cranial computed tomography (CCT) and to whole-body CT

Intubation at AS and in TR

Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)

Gender

Initial number of platelets

Time in trauma room

Resuscitation at AS and in TR

New ISS

Systolic blood pressure at AS and in TR

Partial Thromboplastin time (PTT)

Preclinical rescue time

Thoracic drainage at AS and in TR

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Heart rate at AS and in TR

Prothrombin time

Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay

 

Revised Trauma Score (RTS)

Oxygen saturation at AS and in TR

Base excess

  

Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC)

Count of performed surgery

Lactate

  

Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS)

Administered fluid volume

   
 

Multiple organ failure (MOF)

   
 

Sepsis

   
 

Type of injury (penetrating vs. blunt)

   

AS, Accident scene; TR, Trauma room.

For the analysis of errors occurring in treatment, James Reason’ the definition of an error - “the failure of a planned action to achieve its desired goal” - formed the basis of the identification of errors [14]. Furthermore, the recommendations of the DGU guideline “Treatment of Patients with Severe and Multiple Injuries” and the European guideline “Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma” were used for error analysis [15, 16]. For judging errors in time periods we used the average time of all treated patients in our hospital. The average time for preclinical rescue was 45 minutes, for trauma room treatment 30 minutes, and for the first emergency surgery 120 minutes [17].

All deaths were classified into one of three categories: non-preventable, potentially preventable, and preventable. MacKenzie published three criteria for a potentially preventable death: the injury must be survivable, the delivery of care is suboptimal, and the error in care must be directly or indirectly implicated in the death of the patient [18]. Shackford et al. defined preventability as followed: “(1) Anatomic injury or combination of injury considered survivable; (2) Physiologic state at time of arrival of first responder critical to judgment of preventability; patient generally stable; if unstable patient becomes stable with treatment; (3) Evaluation and management suspect in any way” [19]. Additionally, the definition of the WHO described in the “Guidelines for trauma quality improvements programs” was applied [20].

Every death was judged individually by every author as non-preventable, potentially preventable, or preventable. When opinions differed, the case was discussed until consensus was reached.

Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21; SPSS: An IBM Company; Chicago, IL, USA). Incidences were presented as percentages, measured values as means and standard deviation (SD) in cases of continuous variables and for categorical variables the median and the interquartile range (IQR) were included. Differences were evaluated using the Chi-squared test in cases of categorical variables; and the t-test in cases of continuous variables. When performing the t-test, a Levene-test was also performed. In cases of variance heterogeneity, the Welch-test was used instead of the t-test. When an obvious deviation from normality was found, continuous variables were tested with a non-parametric rank test (Mann–Whitney). Normal distribution was tested using the Kolmogorow-Smirnow-test. Data was considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Between 1st July 2002 and 31st December 2011, a total of 2304 patients were admitted to the hospital. Of those, 256 (11.1%) were children 15 years old and younger. A total of 82 patients had an ISS ≥ 16 and were primarily admitted to hospital.

The mortality rate was 13.4%. The median ISS was 25, the median GCS was 9, the mean age was 7.4 years, and the expected death rate, represented by the RISC score, was 20.3%. The characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 2. The cause of accident is presented in Table 3. The most common cause of injury was traffic accident as a pedestrian, followed by falls from a height of above 3 meters.
Table 2

Characteristics of the study population

 

Median

Interquartile range

Mean value

Standard deviation

ISS

25

11

  

AIS Head

4

2

  

AIS Thorax

1

3

  

AIS Extremities

0

3

  

AIS Skin

0

1

  

GCS

9

11

  

RISC

  

20.3

30.5

TRISS

  

0.8

0.3

Age

  

7.4

5.0

GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, Injury Severity Score; RISC, Revised Injury Severity Classification; TRISS, Trauma and Injury Severity Score; AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale.

Table 3

Cause of injury in the study population

Cause of injury

Percentage

Traffic accident, car

12.2%

Traffic accident, motorcycle

2.4%

Traffic accident, bicycle

4.9%

Traffic accident, pedestrian

26.8%

Fall > 3 m

19.5%

Fall < 3 m

14.6%

Suicide

2.4%

Others

17.2%

Table 4 shows the differences between decedents and survivors. Significant differences are indicated with an asterisk.
Table 4

Differences between non-survivors and survivors

 

Non-Survivors

Survivors

p value

Patients (n)

11

71

 

ISS

38 (41)

22 (12)

< 0.001*

AIS Head

5 (0)

4 (2)

< 0.001*

AIS Face

0 (2)

0 (0)

= 0.181

AIS Thorax

2 (4)

0 (3)

= 0.487

AIS Abdomen

0 (3)

0 (0)

= 0.337

AIS Extremities

0 (3)

0 (3)

= 0.911

AIS Skin

0 (0)

0 (1)

= 0.013*

New ISS

57 (28)

26 (12)

< 0.001*

GCS

3 (0)

10 (10)

< 0.001*

RTS

2.0 ± 2.7

6.5 ± 1.5

< 0.001*

RISC

74.7 ± 26.2

12.1 ± 21.4

< 0.001*

TRISS

0.2 ± 0.4

0.9 ± 0.2

< 0.001*

Age

7.3 ± 4.4

7.4 ± 5.1

= 0.951

SBP AS

70 (115)

110 (33)

= 0.012*

Heart rate AS

55 (106)

105 (30)

= 0.010*

Oxygen saturation (%) AS

75 (196)

95 (18)

= 0.086

SBP TR

80 (119)

108 (32)

= 0.048*

Heart rate TR

84 (137)

106 (33)

= 0.332

Oxygen saturation (%) TR

98 (24)

99 (2)

= 0.216

Number of surgery

2 (3)

1 (2)

= 0.352

Pre-hospital volume (ml)

695.5 ± 735.0

794.3 ± 852.3

= 0.564

TR volume (ml)

2073.9 ± 2289.6

739.9 ± 584.9

= 0.094

Total volume (ml)

2923.9 ± 2963.1

1460.1 ± 1011.2

= 0.210

Hb (g/dl)

8.6 ± 2.8

10.6 ± 1.8

= 0.014*

Platelets (gpt/l)

139.6 ± 72.1

257.9 ± 91.6

< 0.001*

PTT (sec.)

108.3 ± 48.9

27.8 ± 8.5

< 0.001*

Prothrombin time (%)

45.8 ± 23.3

82.4 ± 19.8

< 0.001*

Base excess

-4.9 ± 10.9

-4.9 ± 5.2

= 0.741

Lactate (mmol/l)

13.1 ± 16.4

2.3 ± 3.8

= 0.021*

Time from admission to CCT (min)

33.2 ± 11.8

31.6 ± 11.4

= 0.722

Time from admission to whole-body CT (min)

35.0 ± 12.0

29.4 ± 10.6

= 0.467

Time in TR (min)

39.4 ± 23.1

51.7 ± 19.2

= 0.114

Preclinical rescue time (min)

44.1 ± 16.5

42.9 ± 19.9

= 0.976

ICU stay (days)

2 (3)

5 (12)

= 0.001*

Hospital stay (days)

2 (2)

13 (16)

< 0.001*

Gender Male

72.7%

70.4%

= 0.876

Rate of whole-body CT

57.1%

57.4%

= 0.989

MOF

85.7%

23.2%

= 0.001*

Sepsis

33.3%

14.7%

= 0.235

Intubation at AS

100%

61.4%

= 0.012*

Resuscitation at AS

45.5%

7.4%

< 0.001*

Thoracic drainage at AS

0%

5.9%

= 0.455

Intubation/Re-intubation/Change to tracheal tube in TR

55.6%

43.9%

= 0.511

Resuscitation in TR

37.5%

4.6%

= 0.001*

Thoracic drainage in TR

25.0%

4.6%

= 0.029*

Emergency Surgery

75.0%

30.9%

= 0.014*

Penetrating trauma

0%

0%

 

Suicide

0%

2.8%

= 0.573

Categorical variables are presented as median with the interquartile range in parentheses, continuous variables as means with ± standard deviation, and incidences as percentages; *significant differences; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; RTS, Revised Trauma Score; ISS, Injury Severity Score; RISC, Revised Injury Severity Classification; TRISS, Trauma and Injury Severity Score; AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; AS, Accident scene; TR, Trauma room; Hb, Hemoglobin; PTT, Partial Thromboplastin time; ICU, Intensive care unit; CCT, Cranial computed tomography; MOF, Multi-organ failure.

Deceased children were significantly more seriously injured (ISS 38 vs. 22) than the survivors. Also, the expected mortality, represented by the TRISS and the RISC, was statistically different. The non-survivors suffered from more serious head injuries with an obviously increased AIS head score (5 vs. 4) and decreased GCS (3 vs. 10).

In the group of the non-survivors, the systolic blood pressure and the heart rate at the accident scene were significantly lower (70 vs. 110 mmHg; 55 vs. 105 bpm). At arrival in the trauma room, the systolic blood pressure remained decreased in the non-survivors (80 vs. 108 mmHg), whereas the heart rate no longer showed significant differences.

All coagulation parameters (platelets, PTT, prothrombin time) were worse in deceased children. Additionally, these children had signs of bleeding with reduced hemoglobin of 8.6 g/dl compared with 10.6 g/dl in survivors.

Lactate was significantly lower in survivors (2.3 vs. 13.1 mmol/l), while the base excess showed no difference.

No statistical differences were found for the administered fluid volume, but a trend was verified for higher fluid volume in the non-survivors.

In the group of non-survivors, the rate of multi organ failure was higher (85.7% vs. 23.2%) the rate of sepsis was not statistically higher, but the trend was towards higher rates in deceased children (33.3 vs. 14.7%).

All non-survivors were intubated at the accident scene (survivors 61.4%) and five of eleven patients received cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (survivors 7.4%) No deceased child received thoracic drainage at the accident scene (survivors 5.9%), but 25% of this group needed thoracic drainage in the trauma room (survivors 4.6%). 75% of the non-survivors underwent an emergency surgery, as did 30.9% of the survivors.

All of the children who died suffered from severe head injuries with an AIS head score 5 or 6. No preventable deaths occurred. One death was designated as potentially preventable (Patient 11), although the AIS head was 5, because of an accumulation of errors. The initial intubation was not possible and it lasted 20 minutes to establish a secured airway. The child suffered from hemorrhage, but the initial recognized coagulopathy was not treated for 10 hours. Additionally, a time delay of 106 minutes to surgical treatment occurred and the first surgical treatment lasted 175 minutes. Therefore, this patient was declared as potentially preventable. The patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 5.
Table 5

Characteristics of the non-survivors

Patient

GCS

ISS

RISC

AIS Head

AIS Neck

AIS Thorax

AIS Abdomen

AIS Extremities

AIS Skin

Age

1

3

66

78.2

5

1

5

4

0

0

5

2

3

38

56.7

5

0

2

0

3

1

0

3

3

38

69.8

5

2

2

3

0

0

7

4

3

59

94.1

5

3

5

0

2

0

15

5

3

75

99.9

6

0

0

0

0

0

7

6

3

25

%

5

0

0

0

0

0

7

7

3

25

97.7

5

0

0

0

0

0

7

8

9

25

15.4

5

0

0

0

0

0

15

9

3

29

65.7

5

2

0

0

0

0

4

10

3

75

100.0

5

0

4

5

5

0

5

11

3

50

69.2

5

3

4

0

3

0

8

% not available; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, Injury Severity Score; RISC, Revised Injury Severity Classification; AIS, Abbreviated Injury Scale.

The RISC Score of Patient 8 demonstrated a very high probability of survival. But the patient suffered a severe subdural hematoma and a subarachnoid hemorrhage. A short period after surgical treatment the patient died.

Although no death was classified as preventable, an error analysis was performed. Five children received a fluid volume of more than 1500 ml. In one child, intubation was not possible at the scene until 20 minutes after responders arrived. In three children, no coagulation medication was substituted, so one child had insufficient coagulation for 10 hours. In one patient, the first surgical treatment lasted 175 minutes and in another a second surgical intervention was necessary in the first 24 hours, because of increased cerebral swelling after initial decompressive craniotomy. In one child, no concentrated red cells were available in the trauma room, although signs for bleeding existed and so the first transfusion was performed two-and-a-half hours after arrival. In one patient, the intubation had to be redone in the trauma room because of bleeding. In three children, the time from accident to hospital was longer than 60 minutes.Only three of the patients who died survived the first day after admission. Figure 1 show the time of death and the average time of survival after admission.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2431-14-194/MediaObjects/12887_2014_Article_1125_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Time between admission and death; Mean value 14.58 h; standard deviation: 18.4; N = 11.

Discussion

Analyzing trauma deaths according to preventable and the analysis of errors occurring in the treatment of trauma patients are common. These studies are helpful to improve trauma care. A lot of studies analyzing preventable deaths and errors were performed in adults [58], but only a few focused on pediatric patients. Our study, in contrast to others, included only severely injured children. Moreover, to avoid the influence of inter-hospital transfer, we only included patients, who were primary admitted to our hospital.

The Trauma Registry of the DGU, one of the largest trauma registries worldwide, does not include the data, which is necessary to perform analyses of preventable deaths and occurred errors in the treatment of severely injured patients. Only differences between non-survivors and survivors of documented data in the Trauma Register could be analyzed, for example the administered fluid volume. Therefore, a single-center study is the only way to perform a preventable death and error analyses in Germany.

Because of these system related limitations, our including criteria, and the small number of severely injured pediatric patients, we were only able to include 82 patients. However, our results supported, that errors occur in the treatment of pediatric trauma patients, and therefore, analyzing preventable deaths and errors in children might be as important as in adults.

Similar to the findings of Do et al. [9] the rate of pediatric trauma admissions in our hospital was 11%. Of these admissions, 32% were severely injured with an ISS ≥ 16. The mortality rate was lower than suspected, represented by the RISC score of 20.3% and the mortality rate was lower than in adults during the same period (13.4% vs. 28.7%) [17].

Analyzing the differences between non-survivors and survivors revealed that non-survivors were more severely injured with a lower GCS and higher AIS head score. The AIS head score was the only AIS score that differed between the groups. So it seems that more serious head trauma is the determining injury for mortality in children. This is analog to the results of other studies [2124].

Non-survivors presented a coagulopathy. One possible explanation is that acute trauma-associated coagulopathy is triggered by brain injury [25, 26]. This is explained by the expression of tissue thromboplastin and tissue factor from the injured brain [2729].

In the literature, a more severe base excess is associated with higher mortality [30]. This finding could not be validated in this analysis, because there was no significant difference between the two groups.

The lactate was significantly higher in the group of non-survivors. According to Hindy-Francois et al., this is associated with higher mortality [31].

In our study, the infused total fluid volume was not significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors, but there was a trend toward higher volume in deceased children. This is according to Hussmann et al. [4], who reported worse outcomes for children receiving excessive fluid volume. One possible explanation for administration of higher fluid volume is that non-survivors had a lower systolic blood pressure and a reduced heart rate at arrival. This might be caused by hemorrhage but another explanation might be that these findings were mis-interpreted as hemorrhage, because it is known that severe head trauma can be associated with a lower systolic blood pressure and reduced heart rate because of auto regulation dysfunctions. This dysfunction is associated with a higher mortality rate [32, 33].

In our study, children died very soon after trauma. Only three patients survived the first day. There was no hospital stay greater than 52 hours. In adults, a trimodal mortality model was described [34]. This model could not be validated, although, because of only 11 non-survivors, a definitive conclusion is not possible.

According to the definitions used by Dykes [10] and Diamond [11], no preventable death occurred in the study population because all non-survivors suffered serious head trauma with an AIS head score of 5 or 6. However, errors in treatment of severely injured children occurred.

As mentioned above, massive fluid volume infusion might be associated with a higher mortality rate. In five of eleven deaths in this study, the infused volume was greater than 1500 ml, and even the only zero years old child received a total of 8500 ml. However, because of a lack of guidelines according the volume therapy in pediatric trauma patients a cut-off, for when the infused volume is excessive, is impossible to define.

Damage control surgery is a principle in the treatment of adult patients [35]. In one child, the emergency surgery lasted 175 minutes, because of a craniofacial reconstruction. This is against the principle of damage control surgery, and so it was defined as an error. Another child needed a second surgery within the first 24 hours. In an analysis of adults who died after trauma, a longer surgery time within the first 24 hours was associated with a worse outcome [36].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in Germany investigating preventable deaths in pediatric trauma patients.

Limitations

There are some limitations of this study. First of all, it is a retrospective analysis, although the data from the Trauma Registry of the DGU are collected prospectively. Second, this is a single-center study. Third, only a small number of deaths occurred in children during the time period of the study. Therefore, our analyses are limited because of the small number of patients. However, the hospital is one of the largest in Germany, so only an analysis of the entire Trauma Registry of the DGU would provide a greater number of patients. But the data of the Trauma Registry support no analysis of preventable deaths and only a limited error analysis. No information on pre-hospital mortality of children was obtained, since no data were available.

Conclusion

Brain trauma is the determinant factor in mortality in severely injured pediatric patients. This injury is associated with acute trauma-associated coagulopathy. The overall trauma mortality in children is lower than that of adults. If children die after a severe injury, it happens soon after the trauma. In the study population, long-term intensive care unit stays were not found. Therefore, the known trimodal mortality model of adults might not be suitable in pediatric trauma care.

No preventable death was found in this analysis. However, errors in the acute care of injured children were evident. A great number of the children received an excessive infusion of fluid volume, which might be associated with higher mortality. Also, errors in control of hemorrhage were found. Additionally, extended preclinical rescue time and surgery time within the first 24 were found. Optimizations in these fields might further reduce mortality.

Abbreviations

AIS: 

Abbreviated injury scale

CCT: 

Cranial computed tomography

DGU: 

German society for trauma surgery

GCS: 

Glasgow coma scale

Hb: 

Hemoglobin

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

ISS: 

Injury severity score

MOF: 

Multi-organ failure

PTT: 

Partial thromboplastin time

RISC: 

Revised injury severity classification

RTS: 

Revised trauma score

SD: 

Standard deviation

SPSS: 

Statistical package for the social sciences

TRISS: 

Trauma and injury severity score

vs: 

Versus.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

No external funding was secured for this study, and the authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. There was no external support for this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen

References

  1. Statter M, Schuble T, Harris-Rosado M, Liu D, Quinlan K: Targeting pediatric pedestrian injury prevention efforts: teasing the information through spatial analysis. J Trauma. 2011, 71: S511-S516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Potoka DA, Schall LC, Gardner MJ, Stafford PW, Peitzman AB, Ford HR: Impact of pediatric trauma centers on mortality in a statewide system. J Trauma. 2000, 49: 237-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Potoka DA, Schall LC, Ford HR: Improved functional outcome for severely injured children treated at pediatric trauma centers. J Trauma. 2001, 51: 824-832. discussion 832–4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hussmann B, Lefering R, Kauther MD, Ruchholtz S, Moldzio P, Lendemans S: Influence of prehospital volume replacement on outcome in polytraumatized children. Crit Care. 2012, 16: R201-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruen RL, Jurkovich GJ, McIntyre LK, Foy HM, Maier RV: Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2,594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006, 244: 371-380.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Pfeifer R, Pape H: Missed injuries in trauma patients: a literature review. Patient Saf Surg. 2008, 2: 20-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Settervall CH, Domingues Cde A, Sousa RM, Nogueira Lde S: Preventable trauma deaths. Rev Saude Publica. 2012, 46: 367-375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, Brown C, Salim A, Rhee P, Browder T, Noguchi TT, Demetriades D: Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma. 2007, 63: 1338-1346. discussion 1346–7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Do HQ, Steinmetz J, Rasmussen LS: In-hospital mortality pattern of severely injured children. Injury. 2012, 43: 2060-2064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dykes EH, Spence LJ, Young JG, Bohn DJ, Filler RM, Wesson DE: Preventable pediatric trauma deaths in a metropolitan region. J Pediatr Surg. 1989, 24: 107-110. discussion 110–1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond IR, Parkin PC, Wales PW, Bohn D, Kreller MA, Dykes EH, McLellan BA, Wesson DE: Preventable pediatric trauma deaths in Ontario: a comparative population-based study. J Trauma. 2009, 66: 1189-1194. discussion 1194–5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Esposito TJ, Sanddal ND, Dean JM, Hansen JD, Reynolds SA, Battan K: Analysis of preventable pediatric trauma deaths and inappropriate trauma care in Montana. J Trauma. 1999, 47: 243-251. discussion 251–3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. German Society of Trauma Surgery: Whitebook medical care of the severely injured. 2nd revised and updated edition. Orthopaedics and traumatology Communications and News. 2012, http://www.dgu-online.de/qualitaet-sicherheit/schwerverletzte/weissbuch-schwerverletztenversorgung.html, Supplement 1,
  14. Reason JT: Human Error. 1990, Cambridge [England], New York: Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. German Society of Trauma Surgery: Treatment of Patients with Severe and Multiple Injuries. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/012-019.html]; accessed 22.07.2014
  16. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernández-Mondéjar E, Filipescu D, Hunt BJ, Komadina R, Nardi G, Neugebauer E, Ozier Y, Riddez L, Schultz A, Vincent J, Rossaint R: Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care. 2013, 17: R76-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Schoeneberg C, Schilling M, Keitel J, Kauther MD, Burggraf M, Hussmann B, Lendemans S: TraumaNetwork, trauma registry of the DGU (R), whitebook, S3 guideline on treatment of polytrauma/severe injuries - an approach for validation by a retrospective analysis of 2304 patients (2002–2011) of a level 1 trauma centre. Zentralbl Chir. 2014, epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKenzie EJ: Review of evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness resulting from panel studies. J Trauma. 1999, 47: S34-S41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shackford SR, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, McArdle M, Eastman AB: Assuring quality in a trauma system–the Medical Audit Committee: composition, cost, and results. J Trauma. 1987, 27: 866-875.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. World Health Organization: Guidelines for Trauma Quality Improvement Programmes. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/services/traumacare/traumaguidelines/en/index.html]; accessed 22.07.2014
  21. Courville XF, Koval KJ, Carney BT, Spratt KF: Early prediction of posttraumatic in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009, 29: 439-444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond IR, Parkin PC, Wales PW, Bohn D, Kreller MA, Dykes EH, McLellan BA, Wesson DE: Pediatric blunt and penetrating trauma deaths in Ontario: a population-based study. J Pediatr Surg. 2009, 44: 981-986.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kipfmueller F, Wyen H, Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Wirth S, Maegele M: Epidemiology, risk stratification and outcome of severe pediatric trauma. Klin Padiatr. 2013, 225: 34-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Narotam PK, Burjonrappa SC, Raynor SC, Rao M, Taylon C: Cerebral oxygenation in major pediatric trauma: its relevance to trauma severity and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2006, 41: 505-513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chiaretti A, Pezzotti P, Mestrovic J, Piastra M, Polidori G, Storti S, Velardi F, Di Rocco C: The influence of hemocoagulative disorders on the outcome of children with head injury. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001, 34: 131-137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Affonseca CA, Carvalho , Luis Fernando A, Guerra SD, Ferreira AR, Goulart , Eugenio MA: Coagulation disorder in children and adolescents with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007, 83: 274-282.Google Scholar
  27. Pathak A, Dutta S, Marwaha N, Singh D, Varma N, Mathuriya SN: Change in tissue thromboplastin content of brain following trauma. Neurol India. 2005, 53: 178-182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Joseph B, Aziz H, Zangbar B, Kulvatunyou N, Pandit V, O'Keeffe T, Tang A, Wynne J, Friese RS, Rhee P: Acquired coagulopathy of traumatic brain injury defined by routine laboratory tests: which laboratory values matter?. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 76: 121-125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Carrick MM, Tyroch AH, Youens CA, Handley T: Subsequent development of thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy in moderate and severe head injury: support for serial laboratory examination. J Trauma. 2005, 58: 725-729. discussion 729–30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jung J, Eo E, Ahn K, Noh H, Cheon Y: Initial base deficit as predictors for mortality and transfusion requirement in the severe pediatric trauma except brain injury. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009, 25: 579-581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hindy-Francois C, Meyer P, Blanot S, Marque S, Sabourdin N, Carli P, Orliaguet G: Admission base deficit as a long-term prognostic factor in severe pediatric trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009, 67: 1272-1277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Cooke WH, Salinas J, Convertino VA, Ludwig DA, Hinds D, Duke JH, Moore FA, Holcomb JB: Heart rate variability and its association with mortality in prehospital trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006, 60: 363-370. discussion 370View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Walia S, Sutcliffe AJ: The relationship between blood glucose, mean arterial pressure and outcome after severe head injury: an observational study. Injury. 2002, 33: 339-344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Baker CC, Oppenheimer L, Stephens B, Lewis FR, Trunkey DD: Epidemiology of trauma deaths. Am J Surg. 1980, 140: 144-150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pape H, Grimme K, van Griensven M, Sott AH, Giannoudis P, Morley J, Roise O, Ellingsen E, Hildebrand F, Wiese B, Krettek C: Impact of intramedullary instrumentation versus damage control for femoral fractures on immunoinflammatory parameters: prospective randomized analysis by the EPOFF Study Group. J Trauma. 2003, 55: 7-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoeneberg C, Schilling M, Burggraf M, Fochtmann U, Lendemans S: Reduction in mortality in severely injured patients following the introduction of the “Treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries” guideline of the German society of trauma surgery–a retrospective analysis of a level 1 trauma center (2010–2012). Injury. 2014, 45: 635-638.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/14/194/prepub

Copyright

© Schoeneberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.