Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Integrating a sense of coherence into the neonatal environment

  • Gill Thomson1Email author,
  • Victoria Hall Moran1,
  • Anna Axelin2,
  • Fiona Dykes1 and
  • Renée Flacking1, 3
BMC Pediatrics201313:84

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-84

Received: 26 February 2013

Accepted: 15 May 2013

Published: 22 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Hendricks-Munoz
18 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Linda Shields
7 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Fenwick
10 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Gill Thomson
Resubmission - Version 4
10 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 May 2013 Editorially accepted
22 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-13-84

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Nurture (MAINN), University of Central Lancashire
(2)
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku
(3)
School of Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University

Advertisement