A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants
© Fenton and Kim; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 October 2012
Accepted: 10 April 2013
Published: 20 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Griffin|
|31 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - shripada rao|
|11 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christina Valentine|
|11 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tanis Fenton|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tanis Fenton|
|15 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - shripada rao|
|28 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Griffin|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-13-59|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.