Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Chemokine (C-C motif) Ligand 2 is a potential biomarker of inflammation & physical fitness in obese children: a cross-sectional study

  • M Constantine Samaan1, 2Email author,
  • Joyce Obeid1,
  • Thanh Nguyen1,
  • Lehana Thabane3, 4, 5, 6 and
  • Brian W Timmons1
BMC Pediatrics201313:47

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-47

Received: 2 November 2012

Accepted: 1 April 2013

Published: 4 April 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashwini Mallappa
27 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian McFarlin
17 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Wasilewska
6 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
11 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 7
11 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 8
13 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
14 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 10
14 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 10
14 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 11
14 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 11
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Wasilewska
22 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian McFarlin
1 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ashwini Mallappa
14 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 12
14 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 12
15 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 13
15 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 13
15 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 14
15 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 14
Resubmission - Version 15
Submitted Manuscript version 15
Resubmission - Version 16
Submitted Manuscript version 16
16 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - M. CONSTANTINE SAMAAN
Resubmission - Version 17
16 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 17
23 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian McFarlin
Resubmission - Version 18
Submitted Manuscript version 18
Publishing
1 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-13-47

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University
(2)
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster Children’s Hospital, McMaster University
(3)
Population Health Research Institute
(4)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University
(5)
Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University
(6)
Centre for Evaluation of Medicines

Advertisement