Parents’ expectations of staff in the early bonding process with their premature babies in the intensive care setting: a qualitative multicenter study with 60 parents
- Sonia Guillaume1, 2,
- Natacha Michelin2, 3,
- Elodie Amrani2, 4,
- Brigitte Benier1, 2,
- Xavier Durrmeyer2, 4, 5,
- Sandra Lescure2, 3, 6,
- Charlotte Bony1, 2,
- Claude Danan2, 4, 5,
- Olivier Baud1, 2, 7, 8,
- Pierre-Henri Jarreau2, 3, 6,
- Elodie Zana-Taïeb†2, 3, 6 and
- Laurence Caeymaex†2, 4, 5, 9Email author
© Guillaume et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 September 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 1 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anja Mowes|
|30 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C Anthony Ryan|
|21 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Laurence Caeymaex|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Laurence Caeymaex|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-13-18|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.