Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effective process or dangerous precipice: qualitative comparative embedded case study with young people with epilepsy and their parents during transition from children’s to adult services

BMC Pediatrics201313:169

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-169

Received: 18 February 2013

Accepted: 26 September 2013

Published: 16 October 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sheila Anne Lewis
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Elliott
17 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michele Maddux
18 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sheila Anne Lewis
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Elliott
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
16 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-13-169

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Health-Related Research, School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University

Advertisement