Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Family Nurse Partnership home visiting programme for first time teenage mothers in England: a protocol for the Building Blocks randomised controlled trial

  • Eleri Owen-Jones1Email author,
  • Marie-Jet Bekkers1,
  • Chris C Butler2,
  • Rebecca Cannings-John1,
  • Sue Channon2,
  • Kerenza Hood1,
  • John W Gregory3,
  • Alison Kemp2,
  • Joyce Kenkre4,
  • Belen Corbacho Martin5,
  • Alan Montgomery6,
  • Gwenllian Moody1,
  • Kate E Pickett5,
  • Gerry Richardson7,
  • Zoë Roberts2,
  • Sarah Ronaldson4,
  • Julia Sanders1,
  • Eugena Stamuli5,
  • David Torgerson5 and
  • Michael Robling1
BMC Pediatrics201313:114

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-114

Received: 12 July 2013

Accepted: 22 July 2013

Published: 6 August 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Eleri Owen-Jones
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Eleri Owen-Jones
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Jul 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-13-114

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
South East Wales Trials Unit (SEWTU), School of Medicine, Cardiff University
(2)
Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University
(3)
Institute of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Cardiff University
(4)
University of South Wales
(5)
Department of Health Sciences, University of York
(6)
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners
(7)
Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Advertisement