Predictors of and reasons for pacifier use in first-time mothers: an observational study
© Mauch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 24 August 2011
Accepted: 19 January 2012
Published: 19 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diane Spatz|
|16 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emily Taylor|
|16 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ursula Guillen|
|4 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Scott|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jan 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Scott|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Jan 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.