Management of cryptorchidism: a survey of clinical practice in Italy
© Marchetti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 May 2011
Accepted: 10 January 2012
Published: 10 January 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Faruk Hadziselimovic|
|5 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Kolon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Federico Marchetti|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Faruk Hadziselimovic|
|26 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Kolon|
|25 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Ross|
|4 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Federico Marchetti|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Federico Marchetti|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Jan 2012||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.