Intussusception among Japanese children: an epidemiologic study using an administrative database
© Takeuchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 June 2011
Accepted: 22 March 2012
Published: 22 March 2012
The epidemiology of intussusception, including its incidence, can vary between different countries. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of childhood intussusception in Japan using data from a nationwide inpatient database.
We screened the database for eligible cases ≤ 18 years of age, who were coded with a discharge diagnosis of intussusception (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision: K-561) between July to December in 2007 and 2008. We then selected cases according to Level 1 of the diagnostic certainty criteria developed by the Brighton Collaboration Intussusception Working Group. We examined the demographics, management, and outcomes of cases, and estimated the incidence of intussusception.
We identified 2,427 cases of intussusception. There were an estimated 2,000 cases of infantile intussusception annually in Japan, an incidence of 180-190 cases per 100,000 infants. The median age at diagnosis was 17 months, and two-thirds of the patients were male. Treatment with an enema was successful in 93.0% of cases (2255/2427). The remainder required surgery. Secondary cases accounted for 3.1% (76/2427). Median length of hospital stay was 3 days. Of the 2,427 cases, we found 2 fatal cases associated with intussusception.
This is currently the largest survey of childhood intussusception in Asia using a standardized case definition. Our results provide an estimate of the baseline risk of intussusception in Japan, and it is higher than the risk observed in other countries.
Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction among infants and young children, and can also affect older children and adolescents . Improvements have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of intussusception ; however, poor outcomes can still occur, even in developed countries .
In 1999, Rotashield (the first-generation rotavirus vaccine licensed in the United States) was withdrawn from the market because of a potential increased risk of intussusception . Two recent studies investigated whether the second-generation Rotavirus vaccine was also associated with an increased risk of intussusception [5, 6], and revealed conflicting results. One post-marketing survey reported a small but statistically significant increased risk , while the other study found no evidence of an elevated risk of intussusception . The potential risk of intussusception among vaccinated children has motivated researchers to estimate the baseline risk of intussusception [7, 8]. In the last several years, a growing number of studies have been published focusing on the incidence of intussusception [9–11]. Several surveys have also been published regarding the incidence of intussusception in Eastern Asia including Taiwan, Hong Kong and Vietnam . However, the results vary, ranging from 70 to 300 cases per 100,000 children, suggesting that there are regional differences in the incidence of intussusception.
The primary goal of our study was to describe the epidemiology of childhood intussusception in Japan, including patients' demographic characteristics, management, and outcomes, and to estimate the baseline incidence of infantile intussusception before the introduction of the Rotavaccine program.
Our survey was based on data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) inpatient database in Japan. The DPC database is a nationwide database of inpatients that contains administrative claims data and discharge abstracts. Data are collected for 6-month periods (between July 1 and December 31) each year. For the analyses, we used data obtained in 2007 and 2008. In 2008, for example, data were compiled from approximately 2.9 million inpatients at 855 hospitals. This represented 45% of hospitalized acute care cases in Japan.
The database includes data on diagnoses, comorbidities at admission and complications after admission coded using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes, surgical procedures, length of stay, discharge status including in-hospital death, and costs [13, 14].
Because this study was based on a secondary analysis of the anonymous patient database, the requirement for informed consent was not applicable. Study approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health.
All children aged between 0 and 18 years old admitted with intussusception (ICD-10 code: K561) were screened. At this point, patients with various diagnostic conditions were included. We used criteria developed by the Brighton Collaboration Intussusception Working Group to categorize patients into 5 groups (definitive to not a case), using a mix of major and minor criteria . Although these criteria were primarily developed for vaccine safety data, they are also highly reliable for epidemiological research (sensitivity: 97%; specificity: 87-91%) . Because our database did not contain information about clinical signs and symptoms, we included only cases meeting the clinical case definition of definite (level I of diagnostic certainty) intussusception according to surgical, radiological, or autopsy criteria , and excluded all other cases coded as intussusception in the database. A previous study ensured that this approach enabled us to capture more than 90% of cases with intussusception correctly .
Readmissions to the same hospital shortly after discharge (e.g., within a week) may involve cases with either insufficient reduction or with true recurrence. In this regard, Daneman et al. reported that most of the recurrence occurred within a few days following enema reduction . Accordingly, we considered all admissions for intussusception to the same hospital as independent events.
Estimation of population-based incidence of infantile intussusception
Estimation of Population-based Incidence of Infantile Intussusception
No. of beds in Japan (Ni)
No. of beds in DPC
participating hospitals (ni)
No. of intussusception
from July to December
Estimated No. of cases per year
< 400 beds
(i = 1)
400 - < 600
beds (i = 2)
600 - < 800
beds (i = 3)
> 800 beds
(i = 4)
where i (1 to 4) is the number of each strata, N i is the number of beds in all acute care hospitals in Japan, n i denotes the number of beds in the DPC hospitals and p = 2X i /n i (X i is the observed number of intussusception cases in DPC hospitals between July and December each year). In this estimation, we assumed that there was no seasonality in the incidence of intussusception  and doubled the half-year incidence (X i ) to obtain the whole-year incidence.
In 2007 and 2008, the number of births was 1,090,000 each year. Therefore, we used this number as the denominator of the population-based incidence of infantile intussusception.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic characteristics of patients. To describe the characteristics of the patients, means (± standard deviation) or medians (± interquartile range) are reported where appropriate. Fisher's exact test was used to calculate 95% CI.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and R 2.10.0 (available at http://www.r-project.org).
Characteristics of cases
All-cause admissions, all intussusceptions and secondary intussusceptions in each age group
(per 1,000 admissions)
Among the 2,427 cases with intussusceptions, 93.0% (2,255) were successfully reduced with an enema, and the remaining 175 cases required surgical management. In the surgical intervention group, bowel resection was required in 52 cases (29.7% of the surgical cases). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (median: 3 days in the non-surgical group and 8 days in the surgical group).
We found that 36 patients (37 episodes) had been readmitted to the same hospital within a week after treatment of the initial intussusception (mean: 2.3 days). At the second admission, 32 cases of intussusception were successfully reduced by enema and 5 required surgery. In the surgical cases, underlying conditions were found in 2 children with polyps; none were reported to have perforation.
Secondary causes of intussusception
Pathological Lead Point (N = 77)
Number of Patients
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura
Tumor (details not available)
Congenital biliary dilation + Pancreatitis
We identified 27 (1.1%) patients with complications related to intussusception. These complications included perforation and/or peritonitis (n = 9), systemic infections such as sepsis and meningitis (n = 8), shock (n = 5), seizures (n = 3) and death (n = 2). Intussusception-associated complications occurred irrespective of patient age.
We found 2 fatal cases attributed to intussusception; thus, the mortality rate in our series was 0.08% (2/2427, 95%CI: 0.01-0.30%). The first patient was a 3-year-old girl. She was in cardiopulmonary arrest on arriving at hospital and died within 24 hours after presentation. Autopsy revealed invagination of the intestine. The second was a 2-year-old boy. His invagination was reduced successfully with a non-surgical procedure, but he died of complicated hemolytic-uremic syndrome on the second hospital day. Autopsy was not performed in the second case.
Our study elucidates the nature of childhood intussusception in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the incidence of intussusception among an Asian population using a nationwide database combined with the Brighton Criteria for diagnostic accuracy.
Recent analyses of childhood intussusception in Western countries [1, 18, 19] found that the peak age was between 4 and 9 months; the male:female ratio was around 2:1; PLPs were found in 2.6-15% of cases; and non-surgical enema reductions were successful in 80-95% of patients. Our findings are essentially consistent with these previous reports.
We found that intussusceptions accounted for 3.9 cases per 1,000 all-cause admissions (8.0 cases in 2-year-olds and 0.12 in 18-year-olds). This hospital-based incidence appears to be higher than those observed in Europe (0.66-2.24 per 1,000 children in inpatient departments) . Similarly, we estimated that the population-based incidence of intussusception was 179-191 per 100,000 infants in our cohort. Only one study is currently available regarding the population-based incidence of infantile intussusception in Japan . This earlier study showed that the incidence was 185 cases per 100,000 infants based on a 25-year survey conducted in one small region of Japan. This result is in accordance with our estimation and gives further support to our findings. Our estimated incidence was much higher than those in other countries (179-191 vs 30-80 cases per 100,000 population) . Because both the hospital and population-based incidence rates were higher than those of other countries, it is very likely that the incidence of intussusception in Japan is high compared with other countries. Our results also suggest that the incidence of intussusception cannot be easily extrapolated to other countries, because studies from Eastern Asian countries outside Japan reported that the incidence of intussusception was 70-300 cases per 100,000 children . With respect to the incidence of intussusception, surveys in each region may be essential.
Our study has several advantages. First, we used a standardized case definition of intussusception . This enabled us to compare epidemiologic surveys from other areas and temporal trends in the same area. Reported incidence rates of intussusceptions vary among different populations and times [1, 21, 22]. Thus, standardized case definitions can contribute to maximizing the reliability of epidemiologic data. Second, our study, including over 2,000 patients, is large enough to determine the epidemiology of intussusception. Third, our study determined the case-fatality rate. Little information is available about the mortality rate in developed countries . The mortality rate in our study was 0.08% (95%CI: 0.01-0.30%), which is comparable to data available from the United States reporting 18-56 deaths per 100,000 cases . Furthermore, our data included epidemiologic data of older children and adolescents, which is lacking in previous studies. This study thus provides a deeper insight into intussusception in children of all ages. In addition, our survey included rare but severe complications such as perforation/peritonitis, systemic infections (including sepsis, bacterial meningitis), and neurological involvement. Although previous case reports have sporadically reported these complications [23–25], this study estimates their incidence rates based on cross-sectional data.
Several limitations of the current study should be acknowledged. First, because only inpatient data was included, we may have failed to capture cases treated in emergency units or outpatient clinics. Outpatient management of children with intussusception is widely practiced in some countries [5, 26]. In Japan, however, in-hospital observation is recognized as the standard practice even after successful reduction. Thus, it seems unlikely that we failed to capture a number of cases with intussusception. Second, there is inherent limitation in observational studies using administrative databases. For example, some clinical information was not included in our database (e.g., patients' past and present history, site of intussusception, or types of contrast media used). Another aspect of this limitation is that our study may be susceptible to systemic bias; referral bias, for example, may be present in our dataset. Therefore, our results should be interpreted in the context of the limitations arising from the nature of this study. Finally, our database collected data only over 6 months because of the cost to participating hospitals. Therefore, we could not investigate whether there were seasonal trends of intussusception in Japan. This limitation could influence the estimation of the population-based incidence of intussusception. A prospective patient registration survey may be needed using a standardized case definition such as the criteria set out by the Brighton Collaboration.
This study describes the epidemiology of childhood intussusception in Japan, including current information on incidence data, pathological lead points and complications. We also highlight that the observed incidence of intussusception among Japanese infants is higher than those reported from other countries. Until active surveillance of intussusception is available, the nationwide administrative database has a potential role in monitoring the incidence of childhood intussusception.
This study was funded by Grants-in-Aid for Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.
- World Health Organization: Initiative for Vaccine Research Department of Vaccines and Biologicals: Acute Intussusception in Infants and Children. Incidence, Clinical Presentation and Management: A Global Perspective. WHO/V&B/02.19. Geneva, Switzerland. 2002, [http://www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF02/www640.pdf]Google Scholar
- Stringer MD, Pablot SM, Brereton RJ: Pediatric intussusception. Br J Surg. 1992, 79 (9): 867-876. 10.1002/bjs.1800790906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parashar UD, Holman RC, Cummings KC, Staggs NW, Curns AT, Zimmerman CM, Kaufman SF, Lewis JE, Vugia DJ, Powell KE, Glass RI: Trends in intussusception-associated hospitalizations and deaths among US infants. Pediatrics. 2000, 106 (6): 1413-1421. 10.1542/peds.106.6.1413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy TV, Gargiullo PM, Massoudi MS, Nelson DB, Jumaan AO, Okoro CA, Zanardi LR, Setia S, Fair E, LeBaron CW, Wahton M, Livengood JR: Intussusception among infants given an oral rotavirus vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344 (8): 564-572. 10.1056/NEJM200102223440804.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel MM, López-Collada VR, Bulhões MM, De Oliveira LH, Bautista Márquez A, Flannery B, Esparza-Aquilar M, Montenegro Renoiner EI, Luna-Cruz ME, Sato HK, Hernández-Hernández Ldel C, Toledo-Cortina G, Cerón-Rodriguez M, Osnaya-Romero N, Martinez-Alcazar M, Aquinaga-Villasenor RG, Plascencia-Hernádez A, Fojaco-González F, Hernández-Peredo Rezk G, Gutierrez SF, Dorame-Castillo R, Tinajero-Pizano R, Mercado-Villagas B, Barbosa MR, Maluf EM, Ferreira LB, de Carvalho FM, dos Santos AR, Cesar ED, de Oliveira ME, et al: Intussusception risk and health benefits of rotavirus vaccination in Mexico and Brazil. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364 (24): 2283-2292. 10.1056/NEJMoa1012952.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buttery JP, Danchin MH, Lee KJ, Carlin JB, McIntyre PB, Elliott EJ, Booy R, Bines JE: Intussusception following rotavirus vaccine administration: post-marketing surveillance in the National Immunization Program in Australia. Vaccine. 2011, 29 (16): 3061-3066. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huppertz HI, Soriano-Gabarró M, Grimprel E, Franco E, Mezner Z, Desselberger U, Smit Y, den Wolleswinkel-van Bosch J, De Vos B, Giaguinto C: Intussusception among young children in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006, 25 (1 Suppl): S22-29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bines JE, Kohl KS, Forster J, Zanardi LR, Davis RL, Hansen J, Murphy TM, Music S, Niu M, Varricchio F, Vermeer P, Wong EJ: Acute intussusception in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation. Vaccine. 2004, 22 (5-6): 569-574. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen YE, Beasley S, Grimwood K, New Zealand Rotavirus Study Group: Intussusception and rotavirus associated hospitalisation in New Zealand. Arch Dis Child. 2005, 90 (10): 1077-1081. 10.1136/adc.2005.074104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Buettcher M, Baer G, Bonhoeffer J, Schaad UB, Heininger U: Three-year surveillance of intussusception in children in Switzerland. Pediatrics. 2007, 120 (3): 473-480. 10.1542/peds.2007-0035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tate JE, Simonsen L, Viboud C, Steiner C, Patel MM, Curns AT, Parashar UD: Trends in intussusception hospitalizations among US infants, 1993-2004: implications for monitoring the safety of the new rotavirus vaccination program. Pediatrics. 2008, 121 (5): e1125-1132. 10.1542/peds.2007-1590.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bines JE, Patel M, Parashar U: Assessment of postlicensure safety of rotavirus vaccines, with emphasis on intussusception. J Infec Dis. 2009, 200 (Suppl 1): S282-290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fushimi K, Hashimoto H, Imanaka Y, Kuwabara K, Horiguchi H, Ishikawa KB, Matsuda S: Functional mapping of hospitals by diagnosis-dominant case-mix analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007, 7: 50-57. 10.1186/1472-6963-7-50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kuwabara K, Imanaka Y, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Hashimoto H, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Hayashida K, Fujimori K: Impact of age and procedure on resource use for patients with ischemic heart disease. Health Policy. 2008, 85 (2): 196-206. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bines JE, Ivanoff B, Justice F, Mulholland K: Clinical case definition for the diagnosis of acute intussusception. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004, 39 (5): 511-518. 10.1097/00005176-200411000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daneman A, Alton DJ, Lobo E, Gravett J, Kim P, Ein SH: Patterns of recurrence of intussusception in children: a 17-year review. Pediatr Radiol. 1998, 28 (12): 913-919. 10.1007/s002470050497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arita K, Adachi K, Ogawa M, et al: A series of 126 cases with childhood intussusception over a 13 year period. Shiritsu Itami Byoinshi. 1998, 13-14: 9-12. in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
- Blakelock RT, Beasley SW: The clinical implications of non-idiopathic intussusception. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998, 14 (3): 163-167. 10.1007/s003830050475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daneman A, Navarro O: Intussusception. Part 2: an update on the evolution of management. Pediatr Radiol. 2004, 34 (2): 97-108. 10.1007/s00247-003-1082-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagomi T, Takahashi Y, Arisawa K, Nakagomi O: A high incidence of intussusception in Japan as studied in a sentinel hospital over a 25-year period (1978-2002). Epidemiol Infect. 2006, 134 (1): 57-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fischer TK, Bihrmann K, Perch M, Koch A, Wohlfahrt J, Kåre M, Melbye M: Intussusception in early childhood: a cohort study of 1.7 million children. Pediatrics. 2004, 114 (3): 782-785. 10.1542/peds.2004-0390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Justice F, Carlin J, Bines J: Changing epidemiology of intussusception in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005, 41 (9-10): 475-478. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00686.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ein SH: Intussusception. Pediatric Surgery. Edited by: Grosfeld JL, O'Neill JA, Coran AG, Fonkalsrud MD. 2006, USA: Mosby, 1313-1341.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Conway EE: Central nervous system findings and intussusception: how are they related?. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993, 9 (1): 15-18. 10.1097/00006565-199302000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crushell E, Flanagan O, Devins M, Dunne K, Gleeson J: Intussusception associated with bacterial meningitis. Arch Dis Child. 2001, 85 (1): 56-57. 10.1136/adc.85.1.56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cortese MM, Staat MA, Weinberg GA, Edwards K, Rice MA, Szilagyi PG, Hall CB, Payne DC, Parashar UD: Underestimates of intussusception rates among US infants based on inpatient discharge data: implications for monitoring the safety of rotavirus vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2009, 200 (Suppl 1): S264-270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/36/prepub