The model of palliative care in the perinatal setting: a review of the literature
© Balaguer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 May 2011
Accepted: 12 March 2012
Published: 12 March 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 May 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Balaguer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian Carter|
|23 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caprice Knapp|
|2 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Leuthner|
|27 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Balaguer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caprice Knapp|
|7 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven Leuthner|
|11 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Albert Balaguer|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|12 Mar 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.