Outcome at two years of age in a Swiss national cohort of extremely preterm infants born between 2000 and 2008
© Schlapbach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 4 September 2012
Accepted: 21 December 2012
Published: 28 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jordan Kase|
|8 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Payne|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Marlow|
|20 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivier Claris|
|6 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Giancarlo Natalucci|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allison Payne|
|25 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olivier Claris|
|29 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jordan Kase|
|1 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Marlow|
|5 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Giancarlo Natalucci|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2431-12-198|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.