Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cotinine versus questionnaire: early-life environmental tobacco smoke exposure and incident asthma

  • Chris Carlsten1Email author,
  • Helen Dimich-Ward1,
  • Anne DyBuncio1,
  • Allan B Becker2 and
  • Moira Chan-Yeung1
BMC Pediatrics201212:187

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-187

Received: 1 June 2012

Accepted: 28 November 2012

Published: 5 December 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Davide Caimmi
12 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luciana Tanno
21 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Chris Carlsten
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
26 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Davide Caimmi
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Dec 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2431-12-187

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba

Advertisement